Re: libtool-1.15.23b (i386-unknown-freebsd4.3) check results

2007-02-23 Thread David Fang
After removing LD from my environment: All 112 tests passed David Fang Computer Systems Laboratory Electrical & Computer Engineering Cornell University http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ -- (2400 baud? Netscape 3.0?? lynx??? No problem!) ___

Re: libtool-1.15.23b (amd64-unknown-freebsd6.2) check results

2007-02-23 Thread David Fang
After unsetenv-ing my LD, the tests look much happier. ... SKIP: demo-nopic.test ... == All 111 tests passed (1 tests were not run) == David Fang Computer Systems Laboratory Electrical & Computer Engineering Cornell University http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~

Re: hello-project install failure

2007-02-23 Thread David Fang
Ok, I've figured out my problem. There is no proper curse in m4, perl, or bf for my stupidity. Apparently, some time ago, I thought it was a good idea to "setenv LD g++". (I was building others' non-autotoolized projects that mistakenly linked c++ objects using gcc or ld, which does not necessari

Re: libtool-1.15.23b (amd64-unknown-freebsd6.2) check results

2007-02-23 Thread David Fang
> > Below is an excerpt from [g]make check of libtool-1.15.23b on > > amd64-unknown-freebsd6.2 (most PASSes omitted): > > > FAIL: hardcode.test > > FAIL: pdemo-make.test > > SKIP: pdemo-exec.test > > SKIP: pdemo-inst.test > [...] > > PASS: tagdemo-conf.test > > PASS: tagdemo-make.test > > FAIL: tag

Re: hello-project install failure

2007-02-23 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello David, * David Fang wrote on Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 11:02:55PM CET: > As mentioned from a previous thread, here's a link to a simple > shlib project: > http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/sw/hello-autotools-0.1.tar.bz2 Thanks. I did this: bzip2 -dc hello-autotools-0.1.tar.bz2 | tar xf -

Re: libtool-1.15.23b (i386-unknown-freebsd4.3) check results

2007-02-23 Thread David Fang
Adding another datapoint: > I don't understand why this test fails though. Could you try without > ccache? Things should work with ccache as well, but it seems they > don't. The same tests on i386-unknown-freebsd4.3 were re-run *without* ccache, and gave the same results (some PASSes omitted).

Re: libtool-1.15.23b (i386-unknown-freebsd4.3) check results

2007-02-23 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* David Fang wrote on Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 10:26:06PM CET: > > This failure is because $LD is set wrongly, see the configure output > > earlier: > > > > | checking for ld used by ccache gcc-3.4.0... g++-3.4.0 > % ccache gcc-3.4.0 -print-prog-name=ld > ld Hmm. Do you have $LD set? Does ccache se

hello-project install failure

2007-02-23 Thread David Fang
Hi, As mentioned from a previous thread, here's a link to a simple shlib project: http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/sw/hello-autotools-0.1.tar.bz2 which was just the product of "gmake distcheck". The project was libtoolized with version 1.15.22. The project works fine on all systems I've t

Re: libtool-1.15.23b (i386-unknown-freebsd4.3) check results

2007-02-23 Thread David Fang
Hi Ralf, > * David Fang wrote on Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 05:17:17AM CET: > > > > Here are my results for libtool-1.15.23b on > > > > i386-unknown-freebsd4.3 (most PASSes omitted): > > > Some relevant excerpts and notes: > > > > -->8 snip 8<--- > > = Finding libtool.m4's guesse