Re: Second (non-fPIC) pass messages being suppressed on failure

On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 08:19:56AM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: +AT_DATA([nopicfail.c], +[[ +#ifndef PIC +choke me +#endif +int ans = 42; +]]) + +AT_DATA([picfail.c], +[[ +#ifndef PIC +choke me +#endif +int ans = 42; +]]) Shouldn't one of them (the latter?) be #ifdef PIC? Cheers,

Re: Second (non-fPIC) pass messages being suppressed on failure

Hi Peter, * Peter Rosin wrote on Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 09:03:41AM CET: On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 08:19:56AM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: +AT_DATA([nopicfail.c], +[[ +#ifndef PIC +choke me +#endif +int ans = 42; +]]) + +AT_DATA([picfail.c], +[[ +#ifndef PIC +choke me