Re: Second (non-fPIC) pass messages being suppressed on failure

2007-11-22 Thread Peter Rosin
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 08:19:56AM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
 +AT_DATA([nopicfail.c],
 +[[
 +#ifndef PIC
 +choke me
 +#endif
 +int ans = 42;
 +]])
 +
 +AT_DATA([picfail.c],
 +[[
 +#ifndef PIC
 +choke me
 +#endif
 +int ans = 42;
 +]])

Shouldn't one of them (the latter?) be #ifdef PIC?

Cheers,
Peter


___
Bug-libtool mailing list
Bug-libtool@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-libtool


Re: Second (non-fPIC) pass messages being suppressed on failure

2007-11-22 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Peter,

* Peter Rosin wrote on Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 09:03:41AM CET:
 On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 08:19:56AM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
  +AT_DATA([nopicfail.c],
  +[[
  +#ifndef PIC
  +choke me
  +#endif
  +int ans = 42;
  +]])
  +
  +AT_DATA([picfail.c],
  +[[
  +#ifndef PIC
  +choke me
  +#endif
  +int ans = 42;
  +]])
 
 Shouldn't one of them (the latter?) be #ifdef PIC?

Yes, of course.  Thanks!

Cheers,
Ralf


___
Bug-libtool mailing list
Bug-libtool@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-libtool