Re: [rth@redhat.com: libjava build times]

2005-05-06 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Thu, 5 May 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Libtool has been around since 1996 but its implementation is still fundamentally broken. Which part is _fundamentally_ broken? Being a shell script it can be slow, yes, and quoting is a pain, but you get that with `make', `autoconf' or `automake' as

Re: [rth@redhat.com: libjava build times]

2005-05-05 Thread Peter O'Gorman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ralf Wildenhues wrote: | I'm pretty sure I can get it quite a bit faster even. The patches need | cleanup so that they use allowed file names and work properly in corner | cases as well, but those don't scale with the number of objects, so they |

Re: [rth@redhat.com: libjava build times]

2005-05-04 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Joe, others, * Joe Buck wrote on Mon, May 02, 2005 at 08:01:49PM CEST: We really need something done about this problem, as it interferes with our ability to efficiently develop GCC. How many objects does libjava contain? Rather 100 or 1000? Do you need relinking because of command line