On Thu, 2007-11-22 at 08:19 +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > However, if the second position-dependent run fails
> > (compiler bug, usually, but could also be running out of disk space) it
> > will fail without any error message being printed.
>
> Yes. Have you actually hit a compiler bug that
Hi Peter,
* Peter Rosin wrote on Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 09:03:41AM CET:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 08:19:56AM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > +AT_DATA([nopicfail.c],
> > +[[
> > +#ifndef PIC
> > +choke me
> > +#endif
> > +int ans = 42;
> > +]])
> > +
> > +AT_DATA([picfail.c],
> > +[[
> > +#ifndef P
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 08:19:56AM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> +AT_DATA([nopicfail.c],
> +[[
> +#ifndef PIC
> +choke me
> +#endif
> +int ans = 42;
> +]])
> +
> +AT_DATA([picfail.c],
> +[[
> +#ifndef PIC
> +choke me
> +#endif
> +int ans = 42;
> +]])
Shouldn't one of them (the latter?) be #ifdef
Hello Ed,
Thanks for the suggestion.
* Ed Catmur wrote on Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 02:18:58AM CET:
>
> # Allow error messages only from the first compilation.
> if test "$suppress_opt" = yes; then
> suppress_output=' >/dev/null 2>&1'
> fi
> ...
> # Suppress compiler o
