Hi Peter,
* Peter Breitenlohner wrote on Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 03:27:06PM CET:
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> >It might be even more useful to fix this bug! libltdl should not _need_
> >the .la file at all, neither the .a file.
> >
> >We have an entry for this on our online TOD
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
It might be even more useful to fix this bug! libltdl should not _need_
the .la file at all, neither the .a file.
We have an entry for this on our online TODO list:
http://tkd.kicks-ass.net/GnuLibtoolProject/RoadMap
If you feel adventurous to work o
Hi Peter,
* Peter Breitenlohner wrote on Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 01:34:04PM CET:
> On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >* Peter Breitenlohner wrote on Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 06:35:43PM CET:
> >>Recently I hacked together a small package in order to demonstrate how
> >>libtool works (using auto
On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Peter Breitenlohner wrote on Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 06:35:43PM CET:
Recently I hacked together a small package in order to demonstrate how
libtool works (using autoconf-2.95, automake-1.9.6, and libtool-1.5.20).
Will the demonstration be public? :)
Hi Peter,
* Peter Breitenlohner wrote on Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 06:35:43PM CET:
> Recently I hacked together a small package in order to demonstrate how
> libtool works (using autoconf-2.95, automake-1.9.6, and libtool-1.5.20).
Will the demonstration be public? :)
> I did all this on a linux-gnu
Recently I hacked together a small package in order to demonstrate how
libtool works (using autoconf-2.95, automake-1.9.6, and libtool-1.5.20).
I did all this on a linux-gnu system perfectly capable to dlopen modules,
but prevented that to happen by configuring with "--disable-shared".
In order t
