should be something like a D superposed with |
\markup{ D\translate #(cons -2 0) {|} }
I think
Aurèle
Graham Percival wrote:
On 26-Mar-06, at 1:04 AM, Cameron Horsburgh wrote:
In the Music Glossary '1.108 functional harmony' a piece of old latex
code has crept into the example.
I've had
The following code causes a segmentation fault:
\version 2.8.0
{
\set tupletSpannerDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 4)
\times 2/3 {c' c' c'}
}
The compiler output:
GNU LilyPond 2.8.0
Processing `testi.ly'
Parsing...
Interpreting music... [1]
Preprocessing graphical
That's a severe bug. However, I assume that what you really wanted
was
\set tupletSpannerDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 4)
\times 2/3 {c'8 c' c'}
or
\set tupletSpannerDuration = #(ly:make-moment 2 4)
\times 2/3 {c' c' c'}
Both of these work correctly.
/Mats
Quoting Tuukka Verho [EMAIL
Could you clarify for me what is happening with small caps, please?
Small caps might not work if the font you're using doesn't come in a
small-caps version--it doesn't work for me in WinXP, for example.
There's some code in the manual, at the end of 11.2.3, that fakes it.
Geoff
On Tuesday 21 March 2006 13.54, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
In light of this suprising you and the idea that relative means
relative to something I might suggest that there be no default and
that not specifying a starting point be an error.
Yep.
This is what it used
Thanks for that, Geoff.
It might be a good idea to
(a) note in the documentation that this requires a suitable font (and that
the default fonts might not work?);
(b) use a working example for the graphic in the regression test.
That said, I'm not sure the problem is with the font in my case.
ps2pdf seems to be hanging on the postscript output from
lilypond-book. The directory in which this is happening is
http://serpent.laymusic.org/~newlily/music/gibbons/may.
The offending postscript file is allparts.ps, which is produced by
saying make allparts.ps from allparts.lytex and a bunch
I just installed 2.80. Very impressed with the improvements, but now I get the
following when I try to run lilypond-book:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book, line 1762, in ?
main ()
File /usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book, line 1716,
How did you install it and on what platform?
Do you by chance use Python 2.3 or older? If so, try to upgrade
to Python 2.4.
/Mats
Quoting Stephen Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I just installed 2.80. Very impressed with the improvements, but now
I get the
following when I try to run
% important
% [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\version 2.9.0
\header { texidoc =
The current tie algorithm doesn't take into account
the possibility that only some notes in a chord are
tied with other chords.
}
\paper {
indent = 0\mm
line-width = 100\mm
}
\relative c'' {
b d g1 ~ | b d f ~ | a d f
Kamal wrote:
The following outputs an e with a fermata under it an mf articulation
which is touching the fermata in lilypond 2.8.0 while they are output as 2
articulations seperated from each other in 2.6.5.
e4_\fermata\mf
1- Why did this change in 2.8.0?
Don't know. Maybe some default
11 matches
Mail list logo
