Re: FiguredBass Extender Lines wrong position - 2.9.26

2006-10-23 Thread Trent Johnston
Whoops forgot the reply all Yes I know I provided the answers a while ago. But at the moment the figures still show the same no matter what the position they entered. Both the 3's in 3 7 3 are on the bottom so they shouldn't be swapped in the first place. Even if they are, swapping the

Re: Stem missing from note

2006-10-23 Thread Mats Bengtsson
In that case, I would propose to enter the chords as chords. In the second measure, what confuses LilyPond is that you have one stemless note (the whole note) and one with stem, that should share the same stem. Here's one way to handle it, namely to put the whole note in a separate voice. Read

Re: FiguredBass Extender Lines wrong position - 2.9.26

2006-10-23 Thread Paul Scott
Trent Johnston wrote: Whoops forgot the reply all Yes I know I provided the answers a while ago. But at the moment the figures still show the same no matter what the position they entered. Both the 3's in 3 7 3 are on the bottom so they shouldn't be swapped in the first place. Even if

Re: Bar of 16ths not properly positionned wrt triplets

2006-10-23 Thread Graham Percival
Raphael Manfredi wrote: Whilst typesetting a partition with a duple meter in the upper part and a triple one in the lower (in the form of triplets), I find that the upper 16ths are not properly positionned horizontally: they should come after the 3rd beat of the triplet (3/4 2/3), but they are

shorter braces in 2.9.26?

2006-10-23 Thread Marcus Macauley
Is it just me, or have the braces on PianoStaff and GrandStaff suddently become shorter in 2.9.26? I know LilypondTool (for jEdit) can sometimes display PDF files a little bit differently (braces shifted, dashed lines with longer dashes), but the following file gives me shortened (i.e. not

Bus error on skip within doubly-nested tuplets

2006-10-23 Thread Trevor Bača
Hi, A skip within a doubly-nested tuplet causes a bus error. For example ... %%% BEGIN BUG %%% \version 2.9.26 \new Staff { \times 2/3 { \times 2/3 { c'8 s4 % THIS IS THE OFFENDING EXPRESSION } c'4 c'4 c'4 } } %%% END BUG %%% ... generates the

Laissez vibrer direction

2006-10-23 Thread Marcus Macauley
I see that this issue was unresolved on the lilypond-user list, Panteck and Graham Percival posting (06 Sep 2006). And I ran into it myself today. So here's a bug report. Let me know if I've misunderstood how it's supposed work. Marcus \version 2.9.26 % Bug report for LaissezVibrerTie: %

Re: Laissez vibrer direction

2006-10-23 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi, Marcus: Until the bug is fixed, perhaps you can use #'rotation as a workaround option...? Hope this helps! Kieren. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Re: Laissez vibrer direction

2006-10-23 Thread Marcus Macauley
Kieren MacMillan wrote: Hi, Marcus: Until the bug is fixed, perhaps you can use #'rotation as a workaround option...? Hi Kieren, Thanks for the suggestion! I hadn't thought of that. Unfortunately, it looks like it would be a bit of a pain to tweak the second two arguments of the