On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 05:31:35AM +, Graham Percival wrote:
> Perhaps the thing to do is to add a brief note to the website "bug
> reports" page, inviting people to submit "desired behaviour" to
> the tracker for accepted issues. Maybe as an optional step 4,
> placed in a box at the bottom of
On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 01:49:58PM -0800, Keith OHara wrote:
> On Sat, 08 Jan 2011 03:12:56 -0800, Phil Holmes wrote:
> >It seems to me that it would be a good idea to have some sort of
> >illustration of desired behaviour as well as errant behaviour in bug
> >reports. However, we need to beware
Reinhold Kainhofer writes:
> Because the part-combiner does not check how long notes are... It just
> checks onsets of notes.
That can't be the whole story since the spurious solo does not occur
throughout when one voice is syncopated, just at its end.
--
David Kastrup
___
Reinhold Kainhofer writes:
> Am Samstag, 8. Januar 2011, um 23:30:21 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Reinhold Kainhofer writes:
>> > Am Samstag, 8. Januar 2011, um 22:25:51 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> >> So what do we get? The part combiner messes with the beaming in a
>> >> manner that does not look l
Am Samstag, 8. Januar 2011, um 23:30:21 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Reinhold Kainhofer writes:
> > Am Samstag, 8. Januar 2011, um 22:25:51 schrieb David Kastrup:
> >> So what do we get? The part combiner messes with the beaming in a
> >> manner that does not look like an improvement (arguably by des
Comment #2 on issue 1470 by Carl.D.Sorensen: Change keep-inside-line
defaults to true
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1470
No, the proper way to do it is to add a setting to each of the grobs
PaperColumn and NonMusicalPaperColumn in scm/define-grobs.scm
Thanks,
Carl
Reinhold Kainhofer writes:
> Am Samstag, 8. Januar 2011, um 22:25:51 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> So what do we get? The part combiner messes with the beaming in a
>> manner that does not look like an improvement (arguably by design),
>
> The "problem" with beaming is that the chord (16) on the se
On Sat, 08 Jan 2011 03:12:56 -0800, Phil Holmes wrote:
Is the desired behaviour of LilyPond information that you want to have
in the tracker?
It seems to me that it would be a good idea to have some sort of
illustration of desired behaviour as well as errant behaviour in bug
reports. Howeve
Am Samstag, 8. Januar 2011, um 22:25:51 schrieb David Kastrup:
> So what do we get? The part combiner messes with the beaming in a
> manner that does not look like an improvement (arguably by design),
The "problem" with beaming is that the chord (16) on the second 8th of
the third beat is place
Is there a prize for the maximum amount of errors in one measure of a
real-world piece? The following is the the next to last measure of the
two violins of "The Air"™, first typeset with the part engraver, then by
simple stacking.
So what do we get? The part combiner messes with the beaming in
"Phil Holmes" wrote in message
news:ddb14139152049dba94536222ede7...@advent...
- Original Message -
From: "Marc Hohl"
To: "Lily-Devel List"
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 10:09 AM
Subject: Unexpected behavior of pitchedTrill within tablature
Hello list,
I tried to add this in the
Comment #1 on issue 1470 by PhilEHolmes: Change keep-inside-line defaults
to true
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1470
Presumably this could be done quite simply by adding
\override PaperColumn #'keep-inside-line = ##t
\override NonMusicalPaperColumn #'keep-inside-line = #
On 8 January 2011 13:58, Xavier Scheuer wrote:
> On 8 January 2011 13:33, Daniel Meyer wrote:
>>
>> > I'm not top posting.
>>
>>
>> % Here's what happens:
>> % If you write a note with an accidental
>> % and use the same note in the next measure,
>> % the accidental should be reprinted.
>> % When
On 8 January 2011 13:33, Daniel Meyer wrote:
>
> > I'm not top posting.
>
>
> % Here's what happens:
> % If you write a note with an accidental
> % and use the same note in the next measure,
> % the accidental should be reprinted.
> % When using \partial, it is not reprinted.
>
>
> \version "2.13.
> I'm not top posting.
% Here's what happens:
% If you write a note with an accidental
% and use the same note in the next measure,
% the accidental should be reprinted.
% When using \partial, it is not reprinted.
\version "2.13.45"
\relative c' {
es1
\partial 2
es4
}
- Original Message -
From: "Keith OHara"
To:
Cc: "Phil Holmes"
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2011 3:49 AM
Subject: desired behaviour
Dear Phil and the bug squadders,
Is the desired behaviour(*) of LilyPond information that you want to have
in the tracker?
I notice that items ge
16 matches
Mail list logo
