Re: Issue 1266 in lilypond: Dots in chords can not be moved

2011-10-04 Thread lilypond
Comment #12 on issue 1266 by pkx1...@gmail.com: Dots in chords can not be moved http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1266 I applied the patch (thanks Justin) and it passes make, I still get one regression test show up. See attached. I haven't loaded this on Rietveld yet

Re: Issue 1567 in lilypond: Add documentation for footnotes

2011-10-04 Thread lilypond
Updates: Labels: -Patch-abandoned Comment #12 on issue 1567 by pkx1...@gmail.com: Add documentation for footnotes http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1567 Not abandoned. -Patch-abandoned +Patch-pullYourFingerOutJames! ___

Re: Issue 307 in lilypond: collision slur with tuplet bracket

2011-10-04 Thread lilypond
Updates: Labels: Patch-new Comment #18 on issue 307 by mts...@gmail.com: collision slur with tuplet bracket http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=307#c18 Sketch for fix of issue 307 http://codereview.appspot.com/4813048 ___

Re: Issue 1791 in lilypond: footnote numbering is 'out of order' when using multiple staves in a system

2011-10-04 Thread lilypond
Updates: Labels: Patch-new Comment #2 on issue 1791 by mts...@gmail.com: footnote numbering is 'out of order' when using multiple staves in a system http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1791#c2 Fixes footnote automatic numbering. http://codereview.appspot.com/4877041

Re: Issue 896 in lilypond: When used after \tag, \partcombine may fail to print notes

2011-10-04 Thread lilypond
Comment #4 on issue 896 by k-ohara5...@oco.net: When used after \tag, \partcombine may fail to print notes http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=896 Probably good to put a work-around here, or actually a how-to-work-with-partcombine. The original example is probably

Re: Issue 1791 in lilypond: footnote numbering is 'out of order' when using multiple staves in a system

2011-10-04 Thread lilypond
Updates: Labels: -Patch-new Patch-needs_work Comment #3 on issue 1791 by pkx1...@gmail.com: footnote numbering is 'out of order' when using multiple staves in a system http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1791 Passes make but fails make check. Cannot see where I just

Re: Issue 896 in lilypond: When used after \tag, \partcombine may fail to print notes

2011-10-04 Thread lilypond
Comment #5 on issue 896 by pkx1...@gmail.com: When used after \tag, \partcombine may fail to print notes http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=896 Is this a candidate for an @warning or @knownissue in the doc for \tags? ___

Re: Issue 1791 in lilypond: footnote numbering is 'out of order' when using multiple staves in a system

2011-10-04 Thread lilypond
Updates: Labels: Patch-new Comment #4 on issue 1791 by mts...@gmail.com: footnote numbering is 'out of order' when using multiple staves in a system http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1791#c4 Fixes footnote automatic numbering. http://codereview.appspot.com/4877041

Re: Issue 1844 in lilypond: Changes variable names in include/beam-scoring-problem.hh and beam-quanting.cc

2011-10-04 Thread lilypond
Updates: Labels: Patch-new Comment #10 on issue 1844 by mts...@gmail.com: Changes variable names in include/beam-scoring-problem.hh and beam-quanting.cc http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1844#c10 Sketch for broken beams with consistent slopes

Re: Issue 896 in lilypond: When used after \tag, \partcombine may fail to print notes

2011-10-04 Thread lilypond
Comment #6 on issue 896 by percival.music.ca: When used after \tag, \partcombine may fail to print notes http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=896 I'd say a @knownissue. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org

Re: Issue 1266 in lilypond: Dots in chords can not be moved

2011-10-04 Thread lilypond
Comment #14 on issue 1266 by percival.music.ca: Dots in chords can not be moved http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1266 new version uploaded: http://codereview.appspot.com/5174043 ___ bug-lilypond mailing list

Re: Issue 1852 in lilypond: manuals needs more explicit dependencies

2011-10-04 Thread lilypond
Comment #36 on issue 1852 by julien.r...@gmail.com: manuals needs more explicit dependencies http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852#c36 Build dependencies for .texi files (issue 1852). Write .dep files containing make dependency rules for .texi and .itexi files. They

Re: Issue 1815 in lilypond: lilypond-book fails on Windows

2011-10-04 Thread lilypond
Comment #13 on issue 1815 by uwestoeh...@gtempaccount.com: lilypond-book fails on Windows http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1815 Uwe, did you translate this from German? Yes. Please attach a full log Attached are the original (German) error messages I get with

Re: Issue 1815 in lilypond: lilypond-book fails on Windows

2011-10-04 Thread lilypond
Comment #14 on issue 1815 by uwestoeh...@gtempaccount.com: lilypond-book fails on Windows http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1815 Hmm, to get rid of the Python error, I have to delete manually the folder ly-pdf which Lilypond created in the previous before I can run

Re: Issue 1815 in lilypond: lilypond-book fails on Windows

2011-10-04 Thread lilypond
Comment #15 on issue 1815 by julien.r...@gmail.com: lilypond-book fails on Windows http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1815#c15 Fix a few lilypond-book bugs on windows (Issue 1815). - book_snippets.py: Replace os.link (purely unix) by os.rename. - lilylib.py: Windows

Re: Issue 1815 in lilypond: lilypond-book fails on Windows

2011-10-04 Thread lilypond
Comment #16 on issue 1815 by julien.r...@gmail.com: lilypond-book fails on Windows http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1815#c16 Fix a few lilypond-book bugs on windows (Issue 1815). - book_snippets.py: Replace os.link (purely unix) when it is unavailable by

Re: Issue 1812 in lilypond: NR Context Layout Order rewrite (5.1.7)

2011-10-04 Thread lilypond
Updates: Labels: -Patch-review Patch-push Comment #11 on issue 1812 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: NR Context Layout Order rewrite (5.1.7) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1812 Both TRevor and Graham have given LGT(T) and Graham has OK'd a push.