Re: Another parenthesize issue

2015-08-16 Thread Malte Meyn
Am 15.08.2015 um 16:45 schrieb Andrew Bernard: In the following MWE, when a slur is used, the two articulations overlap. I believe they should be stacked, as in the case shown with no slur. \version 2.19.25 { \slurDown c''16^!-\parenthesize ^ d''-\parenthesize ^ ^!( ees'')

Re: Enhancement: Implement parenthesizing spanners

2015-08-16 Thread Thomas Morley
2015-08-17 0:18 GMT+02:00 Simon Albrecht simon.albre...@mail.de: Lily is being very honest and makes a kind warning telling us that she doesn’t know how to parenthesize spanners. But it would be really nice if we could teach her that :-) %% \relative {

Re: Enhancement: Implement parenthesizing spanners

2015-08-16 Thread Simon Albrecht
Am 17.08.2015 um 00:53 schrieb Thomas Morley: 2015-08-17 0:18 GMT+02:00 Simon Albrecht simon.albre...@mail.de: Lily is being very honest and makes a kind warning telling us that she doesn’t know how to parenthesize spanners. But it would be really nice if we could teach her that :-)

Re: Enhancement: Implement parenthesizing spanners

2015-08-16 Thread Thomas Morley
2015-08-17 0:53 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com: 2015-08-17 0:18 GMT+02:00 Simon Albrecht simon.albre...@mail.de: Lily is being very honest and makes a kind warning telling us that she doesn’t know how to parenthesize spanners. But it would be really nice if we could teach her

Re: Enhancement: Implement parenthesizing spanners

2015-08-16 Thread Simon Albrecht
Am 17.08.2015 um 00:53 schrieb Thomas Morley: 2015-08-17 0:18 GMT+02:00 Simon Albrecht simon.albre...@mail.de: Lily is being very honest and makes a kind warning telling us that she doesn’t know how to parenthesize spanners. But it would be really nice if we could teach her that :-)

Re: Enhancement: Implement parenthesizing spanners

2015-08-16 Thread Simon Albrecht
P.S. The string-or-music? definition in lines 102–103 is not used and may be omitted. Am 17.08.2015 um 02:22 schrieb Simon Albrecht: Am 17.08.2015 um 00:53 schrieb Thomas Morley: 2015-08-17 0:18 GMT+02:00 Simon Albrecht simon.albre...@mail.de: Lily is being very honest and makes a kind

Re: Enhancement: Implement parenthesizing spanners

2015-08-16 Thread Werner LEMBERG
I made an updated version for 2.19.24 and newer (…), which you find attached. [...] Thanks! I think this should be added to the Lilypond core. The only noticeable flaw I found is the interleaving tie parentheses and the collisions with \par Stem or \par Flag. Also, with the first clef,

Re: Possible bug with new \partial

2015-08-16 Thread Simon Albrecht
Hello Mats, IIUC \partial serves to insert an additional amount of time, however in this example we actually need to skip a beat – thus call \partial with a negative duration, which is impossible :-) So you need to insert \set Timing.measureLength = #(ly:make-moment 3/4) before the second bar

Re: Possible bug with new \partial

2015-08-16 Thread Simon Albrecht
Am 16.08.2015 um 22:32 schrieb Mats Bengtsson: On 08/16/2015 10:05 PM, Simon Albrecht wrote: Hello Mats, IIUC \partial serves to insert an additional amount of time, however in this example we actually need to skip a beat – thus call \partial with a negative duration, which is impossible

Possible bug with new \partial

2015-08-16 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Hi, I tried version 2.19.25 to typeset a piece that changes from 4/4 with an upbeat to 3/4 without an upbeat, in the middle of the piece. The new \partial handling worked for all parts, except a part that started with a multimeasure rest. Here's a small example illustrating the problem.

Enhancement: Implement parenthesizing spanners

2015-08-16 Thread Simon Albrecht
Lily is being very honest and makes a kind warning telling us that she doesn’t know how to parenthesize spanners. But it would be really nice if we could teach her that :-) %% \relative { c''-\parenthesize \ c c c c2\! -\parenthesize ~ c } %%

Re: Possible bug with new \partial

2015-08-16 Thread Mats Bengtsson
On 08/16/2015 10:05 PM, Simon Albrecht wrote: Hello Mats, IIUC \partial serves to insert an additional amount of time, however in this example we actually need to skip a beat – thus call \partial with a negative duration, which is impossible :-) So you need to insert \set

Re: Possible bug with new \partial

2015-08-16 Thread Mats Bengtsson
My apologies for spamming the mailing list. After some more trials, I realize that the problem remains even if I write \partial after \time. Still, the problem only appears with multimeasure rests, as the two following examples illustrate: \version 2.19.25 % Working example \relative c'{

Re: Possible bug with new \partial

2015-08-16 Thread Mats Bengtsson
I just realized that if i swap \partial and \time, it works as expected, at least if I explicitly specify the bar line: \version 2.19.25 \relative c'{ \time 4/4 \partial 4 c | d e f g | f2. \bar || %Removing this line still gives ugly collisions! \time 3/4 \partial 4*3 R2.*3 | f4 ( a f ) | f2.