>> Thank you so much for the speedy and clear response. I didn't
>> consider that it was because the notehead styles were different!
>> Glad for the understanding.
>
> Maybe there'd be a way for the implementation to check for the same
> glyph instead? For styles with considerable overlap of
David Poon writes:
> Thank you so much for the speedy and clear response. I didn't consider that
> it was because the notehead styles were different! Glad for the
> understanding.
Maybe there'd be a way for the implementation to check for the same
glyph instead? For styles with considerable
Thank you so much for the speedy and clear response. I didn't consider that
it was because the notehead styles were different! Glad for the
understanding.
-David
On Fri, 4 Nov 2022 at 10:27, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
> Le 04/11/2022 à 18:14, David Poon a écrit :
> > When I use Baroque NoteHeads,
Le 04/11/2022 à 18:14, David Poon a écrit :
When I use Baroque NoteHeads, noteheads in (temporary) different voices
refuse to merge--unless I specifically create a new voice context for both
voices (not just one as in the Temporary polyphonic passages example
When I use Baroque NoteHeads, noteheads in (temporary) different voices
refuse to merge--unless I specifically create a new voice context for both
voices (not just one as in the Temporary polyphonic passages example
