Re: 2.22: unexpected bar numbering when using * lengths and skipBars

On 2022-11-22 19:30, Silas S. Brown wrote: Hm. Josquin des Prez is sort of borderline here... Hi, yes that has notes going across barlines. But wouldn't that cause "barcheck failed" warnings anyway, even apart from the notes using a multiplier? (e.g. the

Re: Automatic barline misplaced?

On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 12:22:14PM +, Mungo Carstairs wrote: > \relative c' { \clef treble \key ees \major \time 12/8 > \tempo "Tempo molto moderato" \partial 8*5 bes4~\p\<( bes2.~ | bes4 ees8 f) > bes4-- g-- ees8 f4.\fermata } > > I thought I might have a go at correcting it myself,

Re: Automatic barline misplaced?

Hi Mungo, At 12:22 on 23 Nov 2022, Mungo Carstairs wrote: > I noticed that at > https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Symphony_No._5_(Sibelius), > the first musical example has the last barline after 9 quavers, when > it should be after 12 (time signature being 12/8). > \relative c' {

Automatic barline misplaced?

I noticed that at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Symphony_No._5_(Sibelius), the first musical example has the last barline after 9 quavers, when it should be after 12 (time signature being 12/8). \relative c' { \clef treble \key ees \major \time 12/8 \tempo "Tempo molto moderato"