Re: Accidentals and Ledger Lines

2018-09-06 Thread Malte Meyn
Am 06.09.18 um 10:04 schrieb Noeck: Thanks for the examples. There is at least one special case missing from the examples: chords on ledger lines. In chords, the ledger lines closer to the staff are not shortened. Two assumptions: either they are over-printed by the ledger lines of the lower (

Re: Accidentals and Ledger Lines

2018-09-06 Thread Noeck
Thanks for the examples. There is at least one special case missing from the examples: chords on ledger lines. In chords, the ledger lines closer to the staff are not shortened. Two assumptions: either they are over-printed by the ledger lines of the lower (more distant) note or their shortening i

Re: Accidentals and Ledger Lines

2018-09-05 Thread foxfanfare
Malte Meyn-3 wrote > Of course you could use \override instead of \once \override but of > course that’s not optimal, therefore I’m forwarding this to the bug > list. The following code shows in which cases also a neighbouring ledger > line should be shortened and where there are ledger lines th

Re: Accidentals and Ledger Lines

2018-09-05 Thread Malte Meyn
[Forwarding to bug-lilypond] Hi foxfanfare, Am 05.09.18 um 11:07 schrieb foxfanfare: As you can see, the ledger line of the note containing the accidental is shortned as expected, but the other aren't and you can see here the natural appears too close. that’s true, neighbouring ledger lines s