Re: Patch:Doc-enhancement identifiers

2013-06-21 Thread Urs Liska
Am 18.06.2013 21:23, schrieb James: On 18/06/13 19:47, Urs Liska wrote: Am 15.06.2013 10:10, schrieb Urs Liska: Hi, as discussed here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2013-06/msg00342.html The definition of identifier names in

Re: Patch:Doc-enhancement identifiers

2013-06-21 Thread James
Urs, On 21 June 2013 09:40, Urs Liska lilyli...@googlemail.com wrote: Am 18.06.2013 21:23, schrieb James: On 18/06/13 19:47, Urs Liska wrote: Am 15.06.2013 10:10, schrieb Urs Liska: Hi, as discussed here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/**

Re: Patch:Doc-enhancement identifiers

2013-06-21 Thread Urs Liska
Am 21.06.2013 12:24, schrieb James: Urs, On 21 June 2013 09:40, Urs Liska lilyli...@googlemail.com mailto:lilyli...@googlemail.com wrote: Am 18.06.2013 21:23, schrieb James: On 18/06/13 19:47, Urs Liska wrote: Am 15.06.2013 10:10, schrieb Urs Liska:

Re: Patch:Doc-enhancement identifiers

2013-06-21 Thread David Kastrup
Urs Liska lilyli...@googlemail.com writes: Do I understand correctly that using git-cl doesn't require push access to the git repository? Yes. That's a way to get patches in the code base without asking for push access? It is a way to get patches into _review_ without asking for push

Re: Patch:Doc-enhancement identifiers

2013-06-21 Thread Urs Liska
Am 21.06.2013 12:35, schrieb David Kastrup: Urs Liska lilyli...@googlemail.com writes: Do I understand correctly that using git-cl doesn't require push access to the git repository? Yes. Good That's a way to get patches in the code base without asking for push access? It is a way to get

Re: Patch:Doc-enhancement identifiers

2013-06-19 Thread Marek Klein
Hello Urs, 2013/6/18 Urs Liska lilyli...@googlemail.com Nobody bothering accepting or at lest commenting a free patch contribution? ___ -- Marek Klein http://gregoriana.sk Gregoriana on

Re: Patch:Doc-enhancement identifiers

2013-06-18 Thread Urs Liska
Am 15.06.2013 10:10, schrieb Urs Liska: Hi, as discussed here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2013-06/msg00342.html The definition of identifier names in http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/file-structure.html is slightly misleading. I think applying

Re: Patch:Doc-enhancement identifiers

2013-06-18 Thread James
On 18/06/13 19:47, Urs Liska wrote: Am 15.06.2013 10:10, schrieb Urs Liska: Hi, as discussed here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2013-06/msg00342.html The definition of identifier names in http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/file-structure.html is

Patch:Doc-enhancement identifiers

2013-06-15 Thread Urs Liska
Hi, as discussed here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2013-06/msg00342.html The definition of identifier names in http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/file-structure.html is slightly misleading. I think applying the attached patch would make it clearer.