Re: Possible bug with new \partial

Simon Albrecht writes: > Hello Mats, > > IIUC \partial serves to insert an additional amount of time, Nope. > however in this example we actually need to skip a beat – thus call > \partial with a negative duration, which is impossible :-) So you need > to insert \set

Re: Possible bug with new \partial

Mats Bengtsson, you wrote Sunday, August 16, 2015 9:55 PM Subject: Re: Possible bug with new \partial My apologies for spamming the mailing list. After some more trials, I realize that the problem remains even if I write \partial after \time. Still, the problem only appears

Re: Possible bug with new \partial

Mats, Here's a workaround, although I bet you already have one: \relative c'{ \time 2/4 \partial 4 c4 | d8 e f g | f4*2 \bar || \time 3/4 R2.*3 | f4 ( a f ) | f2. } Trevor My apologies for spamming the mailing list. After some more trials, I realize that the problem remains even if I

Re: Possible bug with new \partial

Hello Mats, IIUC \partial serves to insert an additional amount of time, however in this example we actually need to skip a beat – thus call \partial with a negative duration, which is impossible :-) So you need to insert \set Timing.measureLength = #(ly:make-moment 3/4) before the second bar

Re: Possible bug with new \partial

Am 16.08.2015 um 22:32 schrieb Mats Bengtsson: On 08/16/2015 10:05 PM, Simon Albrecht wrote: Hello Mats, IIUC \partial serves to insert an additional amount of time, however in this example we actually need to skip a beat – thus call \partial with a negative duration, which is impossible

Possible bug with new \partial

Hi, I tried version 2.19.25 to typeset a piece that changes from 4/4 with an upbeat to 3/4 without an upbeat, in the middle of the piece. The new \partial handling worked for all parts, except a part that started with a multimeasure rest. Here's a small example illustrating the problem.

Re: Possible bug with new \partial

On 08/16/2015 10:05 PM, Simon Albrecht wrote: Hello Mats, IIUC \partial serves to insert an additional amount of time, however in this example we actually need to skip a beat – thus call \partial with a negative duration, which is impossible :-) So you need to insert \set

Re: Possible bug with new \partial

My apologies for spamming the mailing list. After some more trials, I realize that the problem remains even if I write \partial after \time. Still, the problem only appears with multimeasure rests, as the two following examples illustrate: \version 2.19.25 % Working example \relative c'{

Re: Possible bug with new \partial

I just realized that if i swap \partial and \time, it works as expected, at least if I explicitly specify the bar line: \version 2.19.25 \relative c'{ \time 4/4 \partial 4 c | d e f g | f2. \bar || %Removing this line still gives ugly collisions! \time 3/4 \partial 4*3 R2.*3 | f4 ( a f ) | f2.