Urs Liska writes:
> As per NR 3.2.4 it is possible to specify an explicit footnote mark as
> opposed to the automatic number. However, in this case the mark is
> *not* repeated in the footnote itself. The examples in the section
> show that this is not a bug but known behaviour:
>
> \footnote
Urs,
On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 08:27:05 +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
> As per NR 3.2.4 it is possible to specify an explicit footnote mark as
> opposed to the automatic number. However, in this case the mark is *not*
> repeated in the footnote itself. The examples in the section show that
> this is not
