2008/3/21, Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Perhaps worth mentioning - my OS is Vista Home
Premium, fully patched up to today.
Is it possible to find out the differences between
the three versions of libfontconfig-1.dll? Might
this may have been upgraded for Vista, since the
later
the way in Vista. For the time being, the work
around suggested in the other thread still seems to be ok.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Slow-compile-on-Windows-XP---font-caching-problem--tp15962446p16207045.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - Bugs mailing list archive
I've now got my new laptop up and running, so at last I can check how LilyPond
works under Vista. It works pretty well! :) Release 2.11.42-1 installed
without problems and (apart from the very first run of around 50 secs) runs a
trivial file in around 3 secs flat, including the conversion to
2008/3/21, Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Some facts that might have a bearing:
This was a clean install of Vista, not an upgrade.
This was the very first LilyPond installation on this system.
I had admin priviledges during the install, although removing them later has
no effect on
I hope you know that in Vista you have actually 3 modes:
- simple user
- admin
- unsafe admin, ie. system protection turned off
The last one is needed for many applications, like running Winword 2003
on Vista.
Bert
Han-Wen Nienhuys írta:
2008/3/21, Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Han-Wen Nienhuys, 21 March 2008 19:26
2008/3/21, Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Some facts that might have a bearing:
This was a clean install of Vista, not an upgrade.
This was the very first LilyPond installation
on this system.
I had admin priviledges during the
Han-Wen, you wrote 17 March 2008 15:18
2008/3/13, Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
OK - here are the results:
2.11.34-1
Compiles in 15 secs
Uses .fontconfig directory
2.11.35-1
Fails with libguile2-17.dll not found
Copied this in, then
Fails with error
2008/3/18, Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Not really. A couple of minor changes in
fonts/fonts.conf but nothing that seems
significant.
can you post the diff anyway?
However, I noticed that usr/bin/libfontconfig-1.dll
changed between 34-1 and 35-1, and again between
35-2 and
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote 18 March 2008 18:13
2008/3/18, Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Not really. A couple of minor changes in
fonts/fonts.conf but nothing that seems
significant.
can you post the diff anyway?
OK. Here's a diff -q first:
Common subdirectories:
2008/3/13, Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thanks Graham :(
OK - here are the results:
2.11.34-1
Compiles in 15 secs
Uses .fontconfig directory
2.11.35-1
Fails with libguile2-17.dll not found
Copied this in, then
Fails with error about ice-9/boot-9.scm not in
01:36
To: Valentin Villenave
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Bug-Lilypond
Subject: Re: Slow compile on Windows XP - font
caching problem?
this type of stuff is tricky. The last time we
saw this, it was
- dirs.push_back (lilypond_datadir + /fonts/otf/);
- dirs.push_back (lilypond_datadir
. I'd be happy to try
them, but how do I get the binaries for Windows?
Trevor D
-Original Message-
From: Han-Wen Nienhuys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 March 2008 01:36
To: Valentin Villenave
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Bug-Lilypond
Subject: Re: Slow compile on Windows XP
Trevor D
-Original Message-
From: Graham Percival [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 March 2008 08:26
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Valentin Villenave; Bug-Lilypond
Subject: Re: Slow compile on Windows XP - font
caching problem?
You're going to kick yourself over
this type of stuff is tricky. The last time we saw this, it was
- dirs.push_back (lilypond_datadir + /fonts/otf/);
- dirs.push_back (lilypond_datadir + /fonts/type1/);
+ /* Extra trailing slash suddenly breaks fontconfig (fc-cache 2.5.0)
+ on windows. */
+ dirs.push_back
Valentin Villenave wrote:
2008/3/10, Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Under 2.11.42 the fonts are cached in C:\Documents and
Settings\[username]\.lilypond-fonts.cache-2. This also
contains 2 small and one large (682 KB) files, but when
LilyPond compiles it changes just the large
2008/3/11, Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If this problem has appeared also on XP, then it's a regression bug.
Should I just add a comment to issue #545, or open a new issue?
Cheers,
Valentin
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 March 2008 10:29
To: Valentin Villenave
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Bug-Lilypond
Subject: Re: Slow compile on Windows XP - font
caching problem?
Valentin Villenave wrote:
2008/3/10, Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Under 2.11.42 the fonts are cached
2008/3/11, Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yes, definitely a regression. I've gone back to using
2.11.34 which does not suffer this bug, as most of my
documentation work is fiddling with tiny snippets, and a 1
minute delay every time I make a change makes it impossible
to work.
OK.
18 matches
Mail list logo
