Re: Tempo / tuplet bracket bug

2010-01-25 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 1/24/10 1:22 PM, Valentin Villenave v.villen...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 5:36 AM, Trevor Bača trevorb...@gmail.com wrote: The following snippet exhibits a bug in the form of contention between metronome mark and tuplet instantiation: Thanks, and sorry about the delay.

Re: Tempo / tuplet bracket bug

2010-01-25 Thread Valentin Villenave
2010/1/25 Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu: Nope.  It certainly looks like a bug to me.  Please create a new issue, and I'll see if I can get it to work right. Thanks, added as http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=996 Cheers, Valentin

Re: Tempo / tuplet bracket bug

2010-01-24 Thread Valentin Villenave
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 5:36 AM, Trevor Bača trevorb...@gmail.com wrote: The following snippet exhibits a bug in the form of contention between metronome mark and tuplet instantiation: Thanks, and sorry about the delay. Added as http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=995 I think

Tempo / tuplet bracket bug

2009-12-20 Thread Trevor Bača
Hi, The following snippet exhibits a bug in the form of contention between metronome mark and tuplet instantiation: %%% BEGIN TEMPO INSTANTIATION BUG %%% \version 2.13.9 \new Staff { \time 2/8 \times 2/3 { \tempo 8=52 c'8 ( c'8 c'8 } \time 2/8 c'8