Comment #12 on issue 2256 by elu...@gmail.com: empty strings: tabStaff
insists on stringnumbers and looses notes
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2256
that wasn't criticism, just a statement!
Conversion to the new syntax should have worked with convert-ly -ed
without
Updates:
Status: Verified
Comment #10 on issue 2256 by elu...@gmail.com: empty strings: tabStaff
insists on stringnumbers and looses notes
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2256
\makeStringTuning doesn't seem to exist in 2.15.28 (neither in the doc nor
Comment #11 on issue 2256 by d...@gnu.org: empty strings: tabStaff insists
on stringnumbers and looses notes
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2256
Conversion to the new syntax should have worked with convert-ly -ed without
manual intervention. If not, raising a separate
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: -Patch-push fixed_2_15_28
Comment #9 on issue 2256 by carl.d.s...@gmail.com: empty strings: tabStaff
insists on stringnumbers and looses notes
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2256
Pushed to staging as 9203ead
Updates:
Labels: -Type-Critical Type-Defect
Comment #6 on issue 2256 by d...@gnu.org: empty strings: tabStaff insists
on stringnumbers and looses notes
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2256
Changing type to Defect instead of Critical since it is not a
regression
Updates:
Labels: -Type-Defect Type-Critical
Comment #7 on issue 2256 by gra...@percival-music.ca: empty strings:
tabStaff insists on stringnumbers and looses notes
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2256
according to the CG, any regression since the last TWO stable
lilyp...@googlecode.com writes:
Updates:
Labels: -Type-Defect Type-Critical
Comment #7 on issue 2256 by gra...@percival-music.ca: empty strings:
tabStaff insists on stringnumbers and looses notes
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2256
according to the CG, any
Updates:
Labels: -Patch-countdown Patch-push
Comment #8 on issue 2256 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: empty strings: tabStaff
insists on stringnumbers and looses notes
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2256
Counted down to 20120129, please push
Comment #2 on issue 2256 by carl.d.s...@gmail.com: empty strings: tabStaff
insists on stringnumbers and looses notes
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2256
Issue 2242 has been merged into this issue.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
Updates:
Status: Started
Owner: carl.d.s...@gmail.com
Labels: -Type-Defect Type-Critical Regression
Comment #3 on issue 2256 by carl.d.s...@gmail.com: empty strings: tabStaff
insists on stringnumbers and looses notes
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id
Updates:
Labels: Patch-review
Comment #4 on issue 2256 by lilypond...@gmail.com: empty strings: tabStaff
insists on stringnumbers and looses notes
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2256#c4
Patchy the autobot says: LGTM
Updates:
Labels: -Patch-review Patch-countdown
Comment #5 on issue 2256 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: empty strings: tabStaff
insists on stringnumbers and looses notes
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2256
For SUnday, January 29, 2012
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect
New issue 2256 by ralphbug...@gmail.com: empty strings: tabStaff insists on
stringnumbers and looses notes
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2256
S. Runkel writes :
\version 2.14.2
\makeStringTuning #'custom-tuning c g d
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 1:21 AM, S. Runkel s.run...@runkel-it.de wrote:
%{
Phil,
Please find a revised example for *2.14.2*
It will not work on 2.12 but shows the bug at 2.14 on its own.
%}
\version 2.14.2
\makeStringTuning #'custom-tuning c g d' a'
\score {
\new TabStaff {
\set
Updates:
Labels: Patch-new
Comment #1 on issue 2256 by carl.d.s...@gmail.com: empty strings: tabStaff
insists on stringnumbers and looses notes
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2256#c1
Allow open strings in chords regardless of finger positions (issue 2256)
http
%{
Phil,
Please find a revised example for *2.14.2*
It will not work on 2.12 but shows the bug at 2.14 on its own.
%}
\version 2.14.2
\makeStringTuning #'custom-tuning c g d' a'
\score {
\new TabStaff {
\set TabStaff.stringTunings = #custom-tuning
c g' 1 c\4 g' 1
}
}
%{
results
s. runkel run...@runkel-it.de wrote in message
news:loom.20120121t151646-...@post.gmane.org...
Hi,
Just upgraded from 2.12 to 2.14.2.
Problem:
Compiling the example below results in a waring in the log file:
Warnung: Keine Saite fuer Tonhoehe #Pitch c (Bund (5) angegeben)
and the c note is
Hi,
Just upgraded from 2.12 to 2.14.2.
Problem:
Compiling the example below results in a waring in the log file:
Warnung: Keine Saite fuer Tonhoehe #Pitch c (Bund (5) angegeben)
and the c note is lost.
However, that note was shown as the empty 4th string in 2.12.
\score {
\new
18 matches
Mail list logo
