Up...
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Schneidy wrote
> Anything wrong with this suggestion?
I confess I never noticed that before! But your regular output is way much
better than the default one.
I'll save your little script! Thanks Schneidy!
--
Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Bugs-f58488.html
Anything wrong with this suggestion?
Le dim. 16 juin 2019 à 20:54, Pierre Perol-Schneider <
pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Add to the LSR; http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=1094
> Cheers,
> Pierre
>
> Le sam. 8 juin 2019 à 15:08, Pierre Perol-Schneider <
>
Add to the LSR; http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=1094
Cheers,
Pierre
Le sam. 8 juin 2019 à 15:08, Pierre Perol-Schneider <
pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Hi bug squad,
>
> magnifyStaff uses the same key signature padding as a full size staff (0).
> Actually, 100% of the chamber
Hi bug squad,
magnifyStaff uses the same key signature padding as a full size staff (0).
Actually, 100% of the chamber music scores facsimiles found on IMSLP have a
larger padding on smaller staves.
So here's a workaround proposal:
\version "2.19.83"
scaleStaff = #(define-music-function
