OK, it works!
The problem was, I had an old obsolete ~/.ssh/known-hosts file that I
needed to delete, and then I had to create a new one.
Thanks for your help,
Valentin
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/li
"Valentin Villenave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2008/1/7, David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Try logging in manually first. You may need to approve the host SHA1
>> once.
>
> Thank you David. I have no idea how to "manually log in", and neither
> do I know how to approve the SHA1 sum (whe
2008/1/7, David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Try logging in manually first. You may need to approve the host SHA1
> once.
Thank you David. I have no idea how to "manually log in", and neither
do I know how to approve the SHA1 sum (where do I find it? etc).
Can you be more specific? I'm a tota
"Valentin Villenave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2008/1/7, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> I approved you the day before yesterday. It should work right away.
>> Can you post what is not working?
>
> I know you approved me, and I thank you for that; it's just that for
> some strange r
2008/1/7, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I approved you the day before yesterday. It should work right away.
> Can you post what is not working?
I know you approved me, and I thank you for that; it's just that for
some strange reason the ssh access is still denied (I asked Graham and
Joh
2008/1/7, Valentin Villenave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I'll commit some texidoc explanations... as soon as I manage to get my
> rsa pubkey accepted by git.
I approved you the day before yesterday. It should work right away.
Can you post what is not working?
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED
2008/1/6, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Please contact the author of the festival stuff about this.
OK, he has just answered me. Turns out it was definitely *not* a
duplicate, but was meant to checked if the two output files would look
the same despite minor changes in the code.
As for
2008/1/6, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Please contact the author of the festival stuff about this.
Done. I wrote him a long nice mail :)
Quite an interesting project, by the way.
> I have made a mistake, as the file was committed without a texidoc
> header, but it may test valuable
2008/1/5, Valentin Villenave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/1/5, Stan Sanderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > regressions: song-reordering.ly : is this test a duplicate of song-
> > reordering2.ly ?
>
> I think so.
>
> I decided to remove it, as it was obviously a d
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 00:15:46 +0100
"Valentin Villenave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/1/5, Stan Sanderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > regressions: song-reordering.ly : is this test a duplicate of song-
> > reordering2.ly ?
>
> I think so.
>
&
2008/1/5, Stan Sanderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> regressions: song-reordering.ly : is this test a duplicate of song-
> reordering2.ly ?
I think so.
I decided to remove it, as it was obviously a duplicate.
Thank you for all this work; Graham, here's a patch for all typo
errors t
regressions: song-reordering.ly : is this test a duplicate of song-
reordering2.ly ?
There is no descriptive text and, although the two snippets differ in
the order of voiceOne and voiceTwo definitions, the output appears to
be identical in the two tests.
Stan
12 matches
Mail list logo
