On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 08:28:40PM -0500, Paul D. Smith wrote:
> I did reply to you on Sunday, 12 Nov with a description of the change
> I'm working on. If you didn't receive that, let me know and I'll resend
> it. There isn't, currently, a development version available.
>
It seems I haven't r
%% "Eray Ozkural (exa)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
eo> I have a patch that does this but Paul said he's been working on a
eo> more general version. Unfortunately he didn't tell me (yet) what
eo> exactly it is or where I can find a development version. I've been
eo> waiting for his commen
Kirat Singh wrote:
>
> Another beef I have is why can't I generate rules using a foreach? So
> I could also do the above with something like:
>
I have a patch that does this but Paul said he's been working on a more
general version. Unfortunately he didn't tell me (yet) what exactly it is
or wh
So this has annoyed me forever. Why don't we simply use regexes in
pattern rules! I'd like to do something like:
$(PUBLIC_IDL_DIR)/.*/([^/]+): \1
$(INSTALL_READONLY)
Also why not have a regsub instead of patsub? Is there some reason why
regexes are being carefully kept out of make?
I
