Update of bug #18617 (project make):
Status:None => Fixed
Assigned to:None => psmith
Open/Closed:Open => Closed
Operating System:
Update of bug #16389 (project make):
Status:None => Fixed
Assigned to:None => psmith
Open/Closed:Open => Closed
Fixed Release:
On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 15:26 +0100, Jon Grant wrote:
> A wider query relating to these warnings is that since make 3.81 is
> released now, could we change make to use const's instead of #define'd
> values, and inline functions instead of #define macro expressions?
No... well, at least not inline
On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 15:22 +0100, Jon Grant wrote:
> Could this message below be updated to remind that "make update" is
> needed to download the po files?
That message is generated from the standard gettext build environment,
that is provided by the gettext package. It's not part of the GNU ma
I will see what else we have going on, code-wise. Of course there a
number of other things; for example our test suite, while extensive, has
some significant problems and could use some reworking. There are a
number of issues with it that I can discuss with you if you're
interested (the test sui
On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 19:26 +, Daniel Kraft wrote:
> I hope there's still some work to do here, but that should, of course,
> be surely the case.
Hi Daniel;
Definitely there are many things to be done. One complicating factor is
that GNU make was awarded a Google Summer of Code slot, so some
On 10 May 2007, at 20:42, Joseph M Gwinn wrote:
The POSIX.1 standard is very specific, and each and every word was
hard-fought. I would parse it (and the corresponding Rationale) very
slowly and carefully. Even the things not said are important.
There is no intent to put astronomical or attos
Hans,
Hans Aberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/10/2007 09:09:59 AM:
> On 9 May 2007, at 16:30, Joseph M Gwinn wrote:
>
> > In fact, POSIX "Seconds Since the Epoch" is effectively TAI minus an
> > unspecified offset because POSIX counts ~SI seconds regardless of
> > astronomy and thus leap anyt
On 10 May 2007, at 15:29, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
I think the specs ignore the issue, so it is only accurate within
a couple of ten seconds. I figure typical system just ignore the
leap seconds from the epoch, and adjusts the internal clock on the
first lookup after the time server has
Hans Aberg wrote:
On 9 May 2007, at 16:30, Joseph M Gwinn wrote:
In fact, POSIX "Seconds Since the Epoch" is effectively TAI minus an
unspecified offset because POSIX counts ~SI seconds regardless of
astronomy and thus leap anything.
I think the specs ignore the issue, so it is only accurate
On 9 May 2007, at 16:30, Joseph M Gwinn wrote:
In fact, POSIX "Seconds Since the Epoch" is effectively TAI minus an
unspecified offset because POSIX counts ~SI seconds regardless of
astronomy and thus leap anything.
I think the specs ignore the issue, so it is only accurate within a
couple o
On 9 May 2007, at 16:45, Donn Terry wrote:
It is simply NOT possible to satisfy both the
timestamp-for-system-events needs of the real time people (who really
want attosecond resolution -- maybe only 10s or 100s, but really tiny)
and the huge range needed for astronomical needs. The system
ti
12 matches
Mail list logo
