>
> > the value in the definition of a recursively
> > expanded variable is considered to be a "construct", therefore it can
> > also be regarded as a "deferred construct"?
>
> Yes. I think it's useful to consider:
>
> nam = exp
>
> ... as a construct of at least two sections, because nam is immed
> the value in the definition of a recursively
> expanded variable is considered to be a "construct", therefore it can
> also be regarded as a "deferred construct"?
Yes. I think it's useful to consider:
nam = exp
... as a construct of at least two sections, because nam is immediately
evaluated
Thank you for your answer. I have some follow-up questions.
>
> > I understand the following
>
> Apart from the word "cmake", that chimed with my understanding.
>
> > a completely different meaning than the one used in the previous sentences
>
> I think the meanings are consistent if "a section o
> I understand the following
Apart from the word "cmake", that chimed with my understanding.
> a completely different meaning than the one used in the previous sentences
I think the meanings are consistent if "a section of a construct" is itself a
"construct".
> however one situations
> apper
Hello,
I was reading section 3.7 of the GNU make online manual
(https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/make.html#Reading-Makefiles),
especially the second paragraph:
"It’s important to understand this two-phase approach because it has a
direct impact on how variable and function expansion happe
