Hi,
On 8/10/22 22:19, Jean-Baptiste Poittevin wrote:
By using a lot of PHONY targets, I think you're closing a door to one
make greatest feature : not redoing those things that are already up to
date.
If you consider that every rule can generate a useful file (file
containing container
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 12:33 PM Jean-Baptiste Poittevin
wrote:
>
> By using a lot of PHONY targets, I think you're closing a door to one make
> greatest feature : not redoing those things that are already up to date.
>
> If you consider that every rule can generate a useful file (file
By using a lot of PHONY targets, I think you're closing a door to one make
greatest feature : not redoing those things that are already up to date.
If you consider that every rule can generate a useful file (file containing
container image for example) or a dummy file, you can benefit from the
-- Forwarded message -
From: Britton Kerin
Date: Wed, Aug 10, 2022, 11:58 AM
Subject: Re: Making makefiles with primarily phony targets more friendly
To: Katherine Pata
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022, 11:44 AM Katherine Pata wrote:
> I often find myself using makefiles to handle
I often find myself using makefiles to handle things like project linting,
container images, various scripts, initiating tests, and other misc tasks.
Sometimes these include tasks that have real dependencies that make should keep
track of, but often the vast majority of targets are phony.
On Thu, 2022-08-11 at 01:58 +0800, ljh wrote:
> I have three c source files: x.c, y.c, z.c and I name x as the target
> on left. Can I put x.o in the prerequisites on the right too? Are
> they the same, with or without x.o in the prerequisites on the right?
>
> x: y.o z.o x.o # with x.o
Hello list,
GNU Make Manual / 10.2 / Linking a single object file, mentions this:
x: y.o z.o
I have three c source files: x.c, y.c, z.c and I name x as the target on left.
Can I put x.o in the prerequisites on the right too? Are they the same, with or
without x.o in the prerequisites on
Thanks Paul,
I have another quetion. Please help me.
On section 10.2 of the manual:
` x: y.o z.o `
Can I put x.o on the prerequisites on the right part?
` x: y.o z.o x.o` # with x.o
Are they the same?
---
The section 10.2 inspired me to write my little minimal general Makefile
Follow-up Comment #15, bug #57242 (project make):
Note the FIFO support has been added to the current GCC master.
May I please ask about the next Make release, is it planned any time soon?
___
Reply to this item at:
