Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps

2014-08-26 Thread Keith Marshall
On 26/08/14 16:18, Paul Smith wrote: Can't we just #define stat(_p,_b) _stat(_p,_b)? Not sure if that's sufficient: I'm not overly familiar with the limitations on the POSIX emulation functions in Windows. That's effectively what MinGW does anyway, (although it does it through an import

Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps

2014-08-26 Thread Keith Marshall
On 26/08/14 18:22, Eli Zaretskii wrote: Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 08:25:38 -0700 From: Paul Eggert egg...@cs.ucla.edu Cc: Autoconf autoc...@gnu.org, Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com, bug-make bug-make@gnu.org As far as Windows goes, NTFS file systems have 100 ns resolution, and FAT file