[bug #39028] [patch] fix and uniformize four error messages

2013-05-26 Thread Paul D. Smith
Update of bug #39028 (project make): Item Group:None = Enhancement Status:None = Fixed Assigned to:None = psmith Open/Closed:

[bug #39028] [patch] fix and uniformize four error messages

2013-05-20 Thread Benno Schulenberg
URL: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?39028 Summary: [patch] fix and uniformize four error messages Project: make Submitted by: bens Submitted on: Mon 20 May 2013 09:27:25 PM CEST Severity: 3 - Normal Item

RE: [bug #39028] [patch] fix and uniformize four error messages

2013-05-20 Thread Martin Dorey
Message- From: bug-make-bounces+martin.dorey=hds@gnu.org [mailto:bug-make-bounces+martin.dorey=hds@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Benno Schulenberg Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 12:27 To: Benno Schulenberg; psm...@gnu.org; bo...@kolpackov.net; bug-make@gnu.org Subject: [bug #39028] [patch] fix

Re: [bug #39028] [patch] fix and uniformize four error messages

2013-05-20 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Edward Welbourne e...@chaos.org.uk wrote: I think integer is meant instead of integral. 'integral' is the adjective form of 'integer', so, in context, it is correctly used. Eg C99 uses integral as an adjective meaning of integers, C99 and Merriam Webster,

Re: [bug #39028] [patch] fix and uniformize four error messages

2013-05-20 Thread Edward Welbourne
How about using plain language and calling it a whole number instead of using jargon ? How about not catering to the lowest common denominator and devolving to baby-speech for fear that someone may be intimidated by a dictionary ? Saying what you mean in the plainest terms possible isn't