[bug #56025] .RECIPEPREFIX doesn't parse line continuations inside function calls

Follow-up Comment #3, bug #56025 (project make): Making the prefix visible is a good idea. I think that it is more compelling if *every* line is prefixed. It creates a good contrast between recipe lines and multi-line variable definitions. Having to leave off a prefix or two is not to bad. I

[bug #56025] .RECIPEPREFIX doesn't parse line continuations inside function calls

Follow-up Comment #2, bug #56025 (project make): I agree that this is not right. The handling of the prefix character needs a bit of work. However, I should say that I intended the prefix character to ONLY be used to introduce the initial line of a recipe. Maybe that intention needs some

[bug #56025] .RECIPEPREFIX doesn't parse line continuations inside function calls

Follow-up Comment #1, bug #56025 (project make): I now realize that the TAB, could be inserted, and then removed by filter-out. ___ Reply to this item at:

[bug #56025] .RECIPEPREFIX doesn't parse line continuations inside function calls

URL: Summary: .RECIPEPREFIX doesn't parse line continuations inside function calls Project: make Submitted by: jftrudeau Submitted on: Thu 28 Mar 2019 08:09:13 PM UTC Severity: 3 -