> On 2022-09-25 16:25, Dmitry Goncharov wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 2:09 AM Martin Dorey
> wrote:
>> And vfork is where that happens. If I’ve followed the thicket of #ifdef
>> correctly and understood the vfork man page, then this is illegal when using
>> vfork:
>>
>>
On Sun, 2022-09-25 at 13:03 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> The odd thing is that make ALREADY preserves the environment pointer
> and restores it, but it does so after child_execute_job() is called
> (after removing some ifdefs):
Oh, well, clearly child_execute_job() is called from other places, that
On Sun, 2022-09-25 at 10:25 -0400, Dmitry Goncharov wrote:
> However, the this does this reproduce on my sun.
Sorry Dmitry but I didn't understand that sentence...?
The odd thing is that make ALREADY preserves the environment pointer
and restores it, but it does so after child_execute_job() is
Subject: Re: 4.3.90 release candidate segfaults on linux and solaris
* EXTERNAL EMAIL *
On Sun, 2022-09-25 at 06:02 +, Martin Dorey wrote:
> And vfork is where that happens. If I’ve followed the thicket of
> #ifdef correctly and understood the vfork man page, then this is
> ill
On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 2:09 AM Martin Dorey
wrote:
> And vfork is where that happens. If I’ve followed the thicket of #ifdef
> correctly and understood the vfork man page, then this is illegal when using
> vfork:
>
> https://github.com/mirror/make/blob/master/src/job.c#L2556
Thanks, Martin.
release candidate segfaults on linux and solaris
* EXTERNAL EMAIL *
On Sun, 2022-09-25 at 06:02 +, Martin Dorey wrote:
> And vfork is where that happens. If I’ve followed the thicket of
> #ifdef correctly and understood the vfork man page, then this is
> illegal when using vfork:
On Sun, 2022-09-25 at 06:02 +, Martin Dorey wrote:
> And vfork is where that happens. If I’ve followed the thicket of
> #ifdef correctly and understood the vfork man page, then this is
> illegal when using vfork:
>
> https://github.com/mirror/make/blob/master/src/job.c#L2556
It's long past
Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2022 14:17
To: Denis Excoffier
Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
Subject: Re: 4.3.90 release candidate segfaults on linux and solaris
* EXTERNAL EMAIL *
On Sat, 2022-09-24 at 13:06 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> > The crashes in solaris and linux are so similar, and g
On Sat, 2022-09-24 at 13:06 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> > The crashes in solaris and linux are so similar, and go away also
> > so similarly, that i would primarily think about size of types.
> > Under cygwin and MacOS all sizes (pointers, long int, size_t,
> > SIZE_MAX, time_t) are 8, while under
On Sat, 2022-09-24 at 18:23 +0200, Denis Excoffier wrote:
> The segfault also occurs without ‘env -i’.
Thanks for helping me avoid that red herring.
> The crashes in solaris and linux are so similar, and go away also so
> similarly, that i would primarily think about size of types. Under
>
> On 2022-09-24 17:19, Paul Smith wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2022-09-24 at 09:36 +0200, Denis Excoffier wrote:
>> In my specific configuration (under linux, with --disable-nls,
>> --disable-load, without using -j, using 'env -i make -d -n'), a
>> segfault always occurs around line 118 of src/expand.c:
On Sat, 2022-09-24 at 09:36 +0200, Denis Excoffier wrote:
> In my specific configuration (under linux, with --disable-nls,
> --disable-load, without using -j, using 'env -i make -d -n'), a
> segfault always occurs around line 118 of src/expand.c:
>
> My linux is old (2.6.32),
The kernel version
Hello,
At the beginning, i found a segfault in the source code of autoconf-2.71.
I reduced the case and the current test Makefile is as follows:
% cat Makefile
export PATH = $(shell echo "`pwd`/tests:$$PATH")
foo = $(shell echo yes)
all:
echo $(foo)
%
In my specific configuration
13 matches
Mail list logo
