On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 18:53 +, David Wuertele wrote:
I posted this to the developer list but got no response. Looks like there's
been no activity on that list since October. Is it dead? Anyway, here's the
bug report:
Which list do you mean by the developer list? It's helpful if you
-bounces+mdorey=bluearc@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Paul
Smith
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 11:16
To: David Wuertele
Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Bug in make-3.81: variable_buffer moves out from under
buffer
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 18:53 +, David Wuertele wrote:
I posted this to the developer
Martin Dorey mdorey at bluearc.com writes:
And it looks like there are several other instances of it too.
That's what I was afraid of. I looked at the other places where xrealloc
could get called, but I couldn't find any that referenced the original buffer
address after the xrealloc. I
, 2009 13:44
To: bug-make@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Bug in make-3.81: variable_buffer moves out from under
buffer
Martin Dorey mdorey at bluearc.com writes:
And it looks like there are several other instances of it too.
That's what I was afraid of. I looked at the other places where
xrealloc
could
Martin Dorey mdorey at bluearc.com writes:
In the original makefile, does
the long rule really not contain any variables or involve any $(eval)
trickery?
Not sure what you mean by trickery, but it definitely involves eval and
variables.
The rule is created with an eval:
$(eval $(call
=bluearc@gnu.org] On Behalf Of David
Wuertele
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 15:07
To: bug-make@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Bug in make-3.81: variable_buffer moves out from under
buffer
Martin Dorey mdorey at bluearc.com writes:
In the original makefile, does
the long rule really not contain any
