On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 02:25:37PM -0400, Paul D. Smith wrote:
> Yeah, it's a timing thing on foo.x, not related to -W.
>
> foo.x is always rebuilt when -W bar.x is given, which is correct.
> However, sometimes (if the original file and its update happen too
> quickly) make doesn't see that the ti
Yeah, it's a timing thing on foo.x, not related to -W.
foo.x is always rebuilt when -W bar.x is given, which is correct.
However, sometimes (if the original file and its update happen too
quickly) make doesn't see that the timestamp on the file changed and so
it doesn't believe that it needs to re
%% "Art Haas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
ah> I'm seeing a failure in one of the new '-W' tests:
ah> *** work/options/dash-W.base.6 Mon Jun 27 06:48:42 2005
ah> --- work/options/dash-W.log.6 Mon Jun 27 06:48:42 2005
ah> ***
ah> *** 1,4
ah> restarts=
ah> touch
Hi.
I'm seeing a failure in one of the new '-W' tests:
*** work/options/dash-W.base.6 Mon Jun 27 06:48:42 2005
--- work/options/dash-W.log.6 Mon Jun 27 06:48:42 2005
***
*** 1,4
restarts=
touch foo.x
- restarts=1
touch baz.x
--- 1,3
I'm building on i586-pc-linux-gn
