"Paul D. Smith" wrote:
>
> Use what you have, and when the new version is available you can switch
> to that. It sounds like what you have done is largely user-compatible
> what I'm doing.
>
Sounds okay. What are you doing btw? ;)
> As for an internal implementation, I think this is essential
%% "Eray Ozkural (exa)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
eo> However, my makefiles have been lying around for more than 2 _months_
eo> since my _rejected_ patch.
There's no reason for you to feel this frustration. That's what open
source is all about; you have the source, you have your patch, it
Hi,
I might be pushing things too much, but it looks like things are goin'
a bit slow without anyone pushing. My makefile collection that wants
to replace automake needs some small extensions, notably the read.c
features that Paul's working on...
However, my makefiles have been lying around for
