On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 18:02 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > ===
> > process_begin: CreateProcess(NULL, uname, ...) failed.
> > make:
> > process_begin: CreateProcess(NULL, uname -a, ...) failed.
> > make:
> > process_begin: CreateProcess(NULL, cygpath
> From: Paul Smith
> Cc: Mark Brown , bug-make@gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2014 10:28:01 -0500
>
> On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 18:02 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > ===
> > > process_begin: CreateProcess(NULL, uname, ...) failed.
> > > make:
> > > proce
-Original Message-
From: Paul Smith
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 8:57 PM
To: Mark Brown
Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
Subject: Re: win32 compilation of make 4.0 source code?
On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 09:59 -0800, Mark Brown wrote:
First, let me request that you include the question posed to you,
i
On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 09:59 -0800, Mark Brown wrote:
> First, let me request that you include the question posed to you,
> in your Reply responses in this email sequence.
This list, like almost all free software (and most technical public)
mailing lists, prefers trimmed interleaved formats, and di
ntation in Make version 4.1 .
-Original Message-
From: Paul Smith
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 9:35 AM
To: Mark Brown
Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
Subject: Re: win32 compilation of make 4.0 source code
On Sun, 2014-01-26 at 16:22 -0800, Mark Brown wrote:
That example method is a device
On Sun, 2014-01-26 at 16:22 -0800, Mark Brown wrote:
> That example method is a device to perform this .FEATURES test
> without inserting it into an existing Makefile.
> The syntax errors I was seeing were occurring when attempting to insert this
> test into an existing Makefile, full of Targets a
evaluation within a Target evaluation.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Smith
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 11:28 AM
To: Mark Brown
Cc: Eli Zaretskii ; Pavel Fedin ; bug-make@gnu.org
Subject: Re: win32 compilation of make 4.0 source code
On Fri, 2014-01-24 at 11:03 -0800, Mark Brown wrote:
I had
On Fri, 2014-01-24 at 11:03 -0800, Mark Brown wrote:
> I had a make.exe 3.80 and it had problems with "else ifeq"
> constructs, so that forced me to seek a more recent version for win32.
Yes that version didn't support it. You can look at the latest NEWS
file for info on what appeared when:
htt
t: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 8:04 AM
To: Pavel Fedin
Cc: mkbrown_...@hotmail.com ; bug-make@gnu.org
Subject: Re: RE: win32 compilation of make 4.0 source code
From: Pavel Fedin
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 11:53:15 +0400
Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
Obviously, you are trying to execute Makefile written for UN
> From: Pavel Fedin
> Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 11:53:15 +0400
> Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
> Obviously, you are trying to execute Makefile written for UNIX systems, are
> you ? This makefile relies on UNIX shell commands like uname, pwd, basename,
> etc. Right ?
> In order to run this Makefile, you ne
> From: "Mark Brown"
> Cc: ,
>
> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 22:56:10 -0800
>
> I showed some of the output when this new windows/dos make is run
> from the command prompt, in the original message.
Sorry, I thought that was from the Cygwin shell, since you asked
whether this Make is supposed t
> ===
> process_begin: CreateProcess(NULL, uname, ...) failed.
> make:
> process_begin: CreateProcess(NULL, uname -a, ...) failed.
> make:
> process_begin: CreateProcess(NULL, cygpath C:\zzz_13.12.1_gener
> make:
> process_begin: CreateProcess(NULL, p
M
To: Mark Brown
Cc: psm...@gnu.org ; bug-make@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Re: win32 compilation of make 4.0 source code
From: "Mark Brown"
Cc:
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:06:16 -0800
As mentioned I used Visual C++ 2005,
loading the project file and building it:
make_msvc_net2003.vcproj .
> From: "Mark Brown"
> Cc:
> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:06:16 -0800
>
> As mentioned I used Visual C++ 2005,
> loading the project file and building it:
> make_msvc_net2003.vcproj .
>
> This results in a make_msvc.net2003.exe of length 892 KB
> being created in the debug directory.
Does thi
project
under Windows 7 64 , using Visual C++ 2005 .
-Original Message-
From: Paul Smith
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 9:44 AM
To: Eli Zaretskii
Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
Subject: Re: win32 compilation of make 4.0 source code
On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 19:37 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 19:37 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > On Windows, GNU make can be compiled in a quite a number of different
> > ways. It would be helpful if you gave us an idea of which method you
> > used.
>
> He said that: he used Microsoft Visual C++ version 2005.
But I meant, how? Thr
> From: Paul Smith
> Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 12:44:12 -0500
>
> On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 19:37 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > On Windows, GNU make can be compiled in a quite a number of different
> > > ways. It would be helpful if you gave us an idea of which method you
> >
> From: Paul Smith
> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 11:47:54 -0500
>
>
> On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 18:21 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > From: "Mark Brown"
> > > Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 06:04:24 -0800
> > >
> > > I was able to compile the make 4.0 source code downloaded from the
> > > gnu make site using
On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 18:21 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > From: "Mark Brown"
> > Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 06:04:24 -0800
> >
> > I was able to compile the make 4.0 source code downloaded from the
> > gnu make site using Visual C++ 2005 under Windows 7 64 (generated 0 errors,
> > 259 warnings)
>
> From: "Mark Brown"
> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 06:04:24 -0800
>
> I was able to compile the make 4.0 source code downloaded from the
> gnu make site using Visual C++ 2005 under Windows 7 64 (generated 0 errors,
> 259 warnings)
> but executing the resulting make command file from the Windows 7 DOS
I was able to compile the make 4.0 source code downloaded from the
gnu make site using Visual C++ 2005 under Windows 7 64 (generated 0 errors, 259
warnings)
but executing the resulting make command file from the Windows 7 DOS Command
Prompt
yields a series of warnings/errors:
===
21 matches
Mail list logo
