https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/make.html#Rule-Example
In last bullet point, word `that` is repeated twice.
--
Thank you
On Fri, 2019-08-09 at 17:52 +0200, Christof Warlich wrote:
> attached is the comprehensive (and significantly reworked) patch that
> implements the feature of a new internal variable
Hi Christof; .EXTRA_PREREQS is provided in 4.2.93 please test in your
environment.
Note that I did rework some
On Tue, 2019-10-08 at 19:00 +, Martin Dorey wrote:
> Sorry to reanimate this but I think I've run into a regression in 4.2.92
> over 4.2.1 that's probably related to this old email thread. Bug or
> email, bug or email... email:
>
> martind@swiftboat:~/playpen/make-2019-10-08$ cat > Makefile
On Wed, 2019-10-09 at 06:00 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> make: *** No rule to make target 'libcrypto.a', needed by
> 'test2.exe'. Stop.
>
> I have a simple makefile:
>
> $ cat Makefile
> all: test.exe test2.exe
>
> LIBCRYPTO = -l:libcrypto.a
>
> test.exe:
> $(CXX) $(CXXFLAGS) -g2
Update of bug #42125 (project make):
Status:None => Fixed
Assigned to:None => psmith
Open/Closed:Open => Closed
Fixed Release:
On Mon, 2019-10-14 at 22:21 -0400, Dmitry Goncharov via Bug reports and
discussion for GNU make wrote:
> This patch adds a new test features/exec.
I added this test with a few adjustments.
Hi Paul,
Am 03.01.20 um 18:24 schrieb Paul Smith:
Hi Christof; .EXTRA_PREREQS is provided in 4.2.93 please test in your
environment.
Note that I did rework some things to allow it to work with implicit rules
(previously it only worked for explicit rules) although it still can't be
used as a
> please try make 4.2.93 and see if you get the right behavior.
Works for me.
Off topic for this thread and I don't want to stand in the way of progress
towards pervasive use of a better C, but it was another notch more difficult to
build, back in the Debian Jessie / gcc-4.9 era, thanks to
On Fri, 2020-01-03 at 22:51 +, Martin Dorey wrote:
> thanks to some new for loop initial declarations in file.c and rule.c,
> which weren't legal in -std=gnu90, the compiler's default dialect.
Hrm. I had thought that was legal in C90 but I guess I was wrong :(.
On Fri, 2020-01-03 at 20:42 +0100, Christof Warlich wrote:
> By the way, I stumbled into a minor issue entirely unrelated to the
> feature above that you may want to fix: The gnulib git repository
> referenced in bootstrap seems to have changed its location, so you may
> want it to change it
On Fri, 2020-01-03 at 22:21 -0500, Dmitry Goncharov via Bug reports and
discussion for GNU make wrote:
> This patch replaced a c99 piece of code with c90 code.
> This c99 piece of code does not compile with the default ./configure &&
> make.
> Also, -std=c99 removes __attribute__.
I already made
Good morning.
job.c fails to compile on glibc when -ansi or -std=c99 is specified.
../src/job.c: In function 'reap_children':
../src/job.c:753: error: incompatible type for argument 1 of 'wait'
/usr/include/sys/wait.h:116: note: expected '__WAIT_STATUS' but argument is of
type 'int *'
This
Good morning.
This patch replaced a c99 piece of code with c90 code.
This c99 piece of code does not compile with the default ./configure && make.
Also, -std=c99 removes __attribute__.
regards, Dmitry
diff --git a/src/file.c b/src/file.c
index 2f1425e..acc8c0c 100644
--- a/src/file.c
+++
Good morning.
This patch enhances error reporting from the test suite.
E.g.
Clearing work...
cannot unlink work/features/.nfs00c262d501ec: Device or
resource busy
cannot unlink work/features: Is a directory
./run_make_tests.pl: 697: Couldn't wipe out work: Is a directory
regards,
On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 12:10 PM Paul Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-10-14 at 22:21 -0400, Dmitry Goncharov via Bug reports and
> discussion for GNU make wrote:
> > This patch adds a new test features/exec.
>
> I added this test with a few adjustments.
Thank you.
i am glad to report that 4.2.93
15 matches
Mail list logo
