Hi,
Perhaps due to my long and annoying description, one has difficulty in
understanding what the problem I encountered was. Here I would
provide a much shorter description.
GNU Automake generates dependency tree like this in Makefile.in:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp/k$ cat Makefile
a: b
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 12:02 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe whatever prints messages prefixed by
make: *** No rule to make target
is called from several different points in the code, and could give
finer grained messages, all still on one line.
Maybe there is a difference between
Do differentiate error messages from different triggers, all in
preparation for a perl-like
See perldiag for explanations of all Perl's diagnostics. The use
diagnostics pragma automatically turns Perl's normally terse warnings
and errors into these longer forms.
hand holding facility for
This example is certainly simple, thanks.
The Makefile isn't telling make that the rule for making c from d will
also update b. Make caches modification times and doesn't know to
invalidate its cache of b's time.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 01:49 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do differentiate error messages from different triggers,
I'm not sure this is fruitful, but to reiterate: there are no different
triggers. There is one procedure. It looks something like this (100%
psuedo code):
rule *r;
PS what does this information do for you?
I don't know, all I am thinking is hooks (i.e., differing error
messages that can be post processed by:) for a future hand holding
system so one can ask what went wrong? And have super basic tutorial
information given... (target implementation date 2050,
