On Sat, 2013-05-18 at 14:20 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
From: Paul Smith psm...@gnu.org
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 04:12:15 -0400
Hi all. The first release candidate for the next release of GNU make,
GNU make 4.0, is now available for download:
Paul, can you please add 4.0 to the list
On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 19:42 +0200, Denis Excoffier wrote:
Compared with make-3.82, the new make-3.99.90 breaks those Makefiles,
like in tiff-v3.6.1 (rather old i know, before 2003 at least), that
use the construction:
make -${MAKEFLAGS}
Hrm. This is actually specifically discouraged by the
On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 22:35 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
When a dynamic extension is being remade, it is unloaded by calling
unload_file. The latter looks up its argument in a linked list of
loaded objects. Now, unload_file is called with file-name as its
argument; is it 100% sure that this
Hi Paul,
Paul D. Smith psm...@gnu.org writes:
There's still a serious regression in the code due to the change in
pattern rule searching added in 3.82. In some (not that unusual)
circumstance GNU make will chew _enormous_ amounts of memory, compared
to what it used to use in 3.81 and below.
On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 11:09 -0400, Boris Kolpackov wrote:
This is because in the current algorithm, every single time we do an
implicit rule search and compute possible target and dependency names
they are all added to the string cache, even if they are deemed to be
useless and not needed
URL:
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?39028
Summary: [patch] fix and uniformize four error messages
Project: make
Submitted by: bens
Submitted on: Mon 20 May 2013 09:27:25 PM CEST
Severity: 3 - Normal
Item
I think integer is meant instead of integral.
Eg C99 uses integral as an adjective meaning of integers, per 1 b (1) from
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/integral. My googling suggests that
the OP's right, though, that the patched would be more widely understood.
-Original
On 2013-05-20 15:16, Paul Smith wrote:
On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 19:42 +0200, Denis Excoffier wrote:
Compared with make-3.82, the new make-3.99.90 breaks those Makefiles,
like in tiff-v3.6.1 (rather old i know, before 2003 at least), that
use the construction:
make -${MAKEFLAGS}
Hrm. This
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Edward Welbourne e...@chaos.org.uk wrote:
I think integer is meant instead of integral.
'integral' is the adjective form of 'integer', so, in context, it is
correctly used.
Eg C99 uses integral as an adjective meaning of integers,
C99 and Merriam Webster,
How about using plain language and calling it a whole number
instead of using jargon ?
How about not catering to the lowest common denominator and devolving
to baby-speech for fear that someone may be intimidated by a
dictionary ?
Saying what you mean in the plainest terms possible isn't
10 matches
Mail list logo
