Hello!
Please take this patch, Cygwin team told that they would like to integrate
with upstream. I have already posted it some time ago but got no reply.
The patch significantly improves performance of Make under Cygwin.
Kind regards,
Pavel Fedin
Expert Engineer
Samsung Electronics Research
Currently make's configure suggests that it should use DOS-style paths on
Cygwin. This is not true, and this assumption makes path-related mechanisms
to work incorrectly. Currently Cygwin package supplies manual hint in
config.cache in order to work around this.
I think we should also ask MinGW
From: Pavel Fedin p.fe...@samsung.com
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 14:44:58 +0400
Currently make's configure suggests that it should use DOS-style paths on
Cygwin. This is not true, and this assumption makes path-related mechanisms
to work incorrectly. Currently Cygwin package supplies manual
From: Pavel Fedin p.fe...@samsung.com
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 14:42:23 +0400
Please take this patch, Cygwin team told that they would like to integrate
with upstream. I have already posted it some time ago but got no reply.
The patch significantly improves performance of Make under Cygwin.
Hi...
bug-make-bounces+roland.schwingel=onevision@gnu.org wrote on
30.07.2013 17:39:10:
From: Pavel Fedin p.fe...@samsung.com
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 14:42:23 +0400
Please take this patch, Cygwin team told that they would like to
integrate
with upstream. I have already posted it
Hi...
bug-make-bounces+roland.schwingel=onevision@gnu.org wrote on
30.07.2013 17:43:10:
Currently make's configure suggests that it should use DOS-style
paths on
Cygwin. This is not true, and this assumption makes path-related
mechanisms
to work incorrectly. Currently Cygwin
On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 18:39 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
In general, I feel it's wrong to do this: Cygwin is a Posix platform,
so it should be using the Posix code, to be as compatible with other
Posix platforms as possible. EMX is not a Posix platform, so using
its code will likely make the
Hi Eli...
Eli Zaretskii e...@gnu.org wrote on 30.07.2013 18:29:53:
From: Eli Zaretskii e...@gnu.org
To: Roland Schwingel roland.schwin...@onevision.com
Cc: bug-make@gnu.org, p.fe...@samsung.com
Date: 30.07.2013 18:32
Subject: Re: [PATCH1/2] Use spawn() on Cygwin
Cc: bug-make@gnu.org,
Cc: bug-make@gnu.org, Pavel Fedin p.fe...@samsung.com
From: Roland Schwingel roland.schwin...@onevision.com
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 18:29:07 +0200
I clearly think the DOS paths mode should remain in even for cygwin. I
know that there are objections in cygwins top level management against
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Eli Zaretskii e...@gnu.org wrote:
From: Pavel Fedin p.fe...@samsung.com
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 14:42:23 +0400
Please take this patch, Cygwin team told that they would like to integrate
with upstream. I have already posted it some time ago but got no reply.
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 11:52:58 -0500
From: Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com
Cc: Pavel Fedin p.fe...@samsung.com, bug-make@gnu.org
fork() is a very expensive operation in cygwin.
Yes, I know. But without it, some things that are expected of a Posix
behavior will not work. A notable
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 01:24:45 +0400
From: Pavel Fedin pavel_fe...@mail.ru
Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
There was a short discussion in Cygwin ML with test results, sorry, i
cannot find the URL, Google fails to find it.
Can you at least tell when (year and month) this discussion took
place?
In
12 matches
Mail list logo
