Hi Paul,
Paul D. Smith psm...@gnu.org writes:
I'm not sure I fully understood the situation.
This comment makes it sound like same version of make (same code) is 50%
slower on the new system. Is that what you meant?
Yes, the same make binary is 50% faster on 2-generations old Xeon
Hello!
I think the problem is abspath, which fails on Cygwin with DOS-style
file names with a drive letter. Fixing that function on Cygwin is a
priority for this release, if possible. The patch you suggest, OTOH,
entirely disables support for DOS-style file names in the Cygwin build,
From: Pavel Fedin p.fe...@samsung.com
Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 16:12:10 +0400
Just a reminder. I have followed your suggestion and fixed this a month
ago. Please try this:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-make/2013-08/msg00031.html
I didn't forget, I just don't
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 13:51 +0200, Boris Kolpackov wrote:
Paul D. Smith psm...@gnu.org writes:
I'm not sure I fully understood the situation.
This comment makes it sound like same version of make (same code) is 50%
slower on the new system. Is that what you meant?
Yes, the same make
