Hello!
Done.
Thank you very much!
My take on this is that I need to see the refactoring to say something
intelligent about it.
Ok, of course. :)
Currently i have some high-priority problems here, when i have more time
i'll get back to it and of course post the patch.
Kind regards,
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #41246 (project make):
The changes seem simple enough and non-controversial. However, this
introduces a new special target, .BATCH_MODE_SHELL (why not
.BATCH_MODE_ONLY_SHELL, btw?), which should at least be documented in the
manual.
Paul, do you agree with adding a new
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #41246 (project make):
Not being familiar with the various different options for shell behavior on
Windows, can someone describe for me what BATCH_MODE_ONLY_SHELL does? Does is
overlap with ONESHELL? If not is it a feature that might be useful to people
on non-Windows
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #41246 (project make):
why not .BATCH_MODE_ONLY_SHELL, btw?
Apart from making it the same as the macro, the only feels too much for a
target name. I don't care that much for the name, though, your pick.
which should at least be documented in the manual.
Would you
