RE: Make Runtime Error

Hi Eli, Thanks for the response. Please see the result below. D:\Shibin\FishEyeWorkSpace\ssw_mr_tool\java_mrtool\srcmake --debug=j GNU Make 3.81 Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for

[bug #42617] Loaded Object Interface: function call doesn't take variables as parameters

Follow-up Comment #2, bug #42617 (project make): Hello Paul, It was actually the flag issue. Now it works as expected. Thanks for your quick reply on this. -B ___ Reply to this item at: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?42617

[bug #42617] Loaded Object Interface: function call doesn't take variables as parameters

Update of bug #42617 (project make): Status:None = Works for me Open/Closed:Open = Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #3: Ok thanks for the

Re: Make Runtime Error

From: shibin.na...@wipro.com CC: bug-make@gnu.org Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 06:54:56 + D:\Shibin\FishEyeWorkSpace\ssw_mr_tool\java_mrtool\srcmake --debug=j GNU Make 3.81 Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.

Make does not throw an error for target without a recipe?

See example: ---8--- TARGETS = foo all: $(TARGETS) $(TARGETS): /etc/passwd ---8--- This is the debug output I get from running this test.mk, comments inline: $ make -f test.mk -d foo GNU Make 4.0 Built for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Copyright (C) 1988-2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

RE: Make does not throw an error for target without a recipe?

Why is it trying to build target test.mk...??? That's explained by https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/make.html#Remaking-Makefiles. Then it decides it was successful? For some value of successful. With your makefile: martind@swiftboat:~/tmp/batrick-2014-06-26$ make -f test.mk foo

Re: Make does not throw an error for target without a recipe?

Hi Martin, On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Martin Dorey martin.do...@hds.com wrote: Why is it trying to build target test.mk...??? That's explained by https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/make.html#Remaking-Makefiles. Thanks, that makes sense. Then it decides it was successful? For

Re: Make does not throw an error for target without a recipe?

On Thu, 2014-06-26 at 16:19 -0400, Patrick Donnelly wrote: Updating makefiles Considering target file 'test.mk'. Looking for an implicit rule for 'test.mk'. [...] Why is it trying to build target test.mk...??? See

Re: Make does not throw an error for target without a recipe?

Hi Paul, On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Paul Smith psm...@gnu.org wrote: File 'foo' does not exist. Looking for an implicit rule for 'foo'. [...] No implicit rule found for 'foo'. Considering target file '/etc/passwd'. Looking for an implicit rule for '/etc/passwd'. [...] No

Re: Make does not throw an error for target without a recipe?

On Thu, 2014-06-26 at 16:19 -0400, Patrick Donnelly wrote: I'm bringing this problem up because targets are not being created (as expected) by implicit rules but I don't know this because make claims success. This part doesn't make sense to me; maybe you can provide more info here. An

RE: Make does not throw an error for target without a recipe?

I'm afraid none of this exercise is helpful for solving the problem Perhaps putting my point in different words will better convey it: you could simply adjust your expectation, to regard this as a failure: make: Nothing to be done for `foo'. But... To put it concisely: how do I get Make to

Re: Make does not throw an error for target without a recipe?

On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Martin Dorey martin.do...@hds.com wrote: I'm afraid none of this exercise is helpful for solving the problem Perhaps putting my point in different words will better convey it: you could simply adjust your expectation, to regard this as a failure: make:

RE: Make does not throw an error for target without a recipe?

Maybe that's why my code always uses https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/make.html#Static-Pattern: martind@swiftboat:~/tmp/batrick-2014-06-26$ cat test.mk .SUFFIXES: TARGETS = foo $(addsuffix .o,$(TARGETS)): %.o: %.c; cc -o $@ $ $(TARGETS): %: %.o; ld -o $@ $^ %::; @echo no recipe for

Re: Make does not throw an error for target without a recipe?

On Thu, 2014-06-26 at 17:00 -0400, Patrick Donnelly wrote: This is a little inconvenient when you're relying on implicit rules. e.g. %.o: %.c cc -o $@ $ %: %.o ld $@ $^ foo: bar.a Even if foo.c is missing, Make still succeeds. This is actually what I'm dealing with and I'd