On 03/14/2018 10:21 AM, Edward Welbourne wrote:
You might get lucky, but the maintainer probably has many other things
to do - your chances will be considerably better if you write a patch
that does it and offer that as implementation. So perhaps a better
question to ask would be "Would you be
Barath Aron (13 March 2018 21:47)
> I'd like to build projects on a system that lacks fork() and vfork()
> support, but has posix_spawn(). Would you implement an alternate version
> using posix_spawn() to spawn child processes?
You might get lucky, but the maintainer probably has many other
