On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 18:55 +0530, Sijith James Philip wrote:
For project specific need i want to change makefile version 3.82 to 3.81.
Is it possible to do that.
The source code for most previous versions of GNU make is available for
download:
http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/make/
Choose the one
On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 12:32 -0600, david.hag...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a make file that includes a set of machine generated dependency
files. Those files describe a set of shared libraries to be build, of the
form:
somedir/libfoo.so: somedir/libbar.so somedir/libbaz.so
Note that
On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 15:40 -0600, david.hag...@gmail.com wrote:
Try running the parallel version with -d (redirect the output because
it's voluminous) and see what make says about trying to build
somedir/libfoo.so: what does it say about the somedir/libbar.so
prerequisite?
That it does
On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 17:35 -0600, David Hagood wrote:
On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 17:02 -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 15:40 -0600, david.hag...@gmail.com wrote:
Try running the parallel version with -d (redirect the output because
it's voluminous) and see what make says
On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 22:42 +0100, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
the copyright assignment form reached the FSF more than a week ago.
Would be great to get some more review on my patch now.
I don't mind if on-list, off-list, half-half...
Hi Sebastian. I got notified by the FSF that your
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 19:32 +, Troy Runkel wrote:
The GNU make configure script currently doesn’t enable high resolution
file timestamp support for the Mac OSX platform. However, nanosecond
file timestamps are available, they’re just stored in a different
location in the ‘struct stat’
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 13:34 -0700, Tim Newsome wrote:
We do a lot of builds (as in double-digit servers building non-stop).
Sometimes, when a part of the build fails, make -j8 would die with:
make: INTERNAL: Exiting with 9 jobserver tokens available; should be
8
With -j16 the error would
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 14:51 -0500, tz wrote:
On Nov 10, 2011 2:32 PM, Paul Smith psm...@gnu.org wrote:
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 10:36 -0500, tz wrote:
You don't need to cross-compile: you can compile natively. What you
can't do is rely on your upstream vendor to provide you the toolchain
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 10:36 -0500, tz wrote:
Unfortunately, in the embedded world, not everything is updated
constantly. Even the desktop is not updated weekly. ARM is still at
Fedora 12, though 16 was just released. I don't and won't have an
updated kernel tree that works unless I find
On Sun, 2011-10-23 at 19:21 +0200, earlgrey wrote:
__modules := $(sort $(shell grep -h '\.ko' /dev/null $(wildcard
$(MODVERDIR)/*.mod)))
with MODVERDIR=fglrx-11.06[Driver 8.861]
There's no problem with underscores.
The problem with [] is that these are special to the shell's globbing
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 05:56 +0200, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
On 10/11/2011 10:11 PM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Alright. Please initiate the copyright assignment process.
Any news on this? So there are no preperations to do?
The paperwork generally requires you to list the files that you
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 09:05 +0200, Alexander Kriegisch wrote:
Some more information: I found the relevant string in
/usr/share/locale-langpack/de/LC_MESSAGES/make.mo
which is part of Debian package language-pack-de-base, currently
installed on my Ubuntu Oneiric in version 1:11.10+20111006.
On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 12:58 +0200, Alexander Kriegisch wrote:
I am using GNU make 3.81 on Ubuntu oneiric (11.10). I noticed that the
German error message Konnte nicht geöffnet werden. is sometimes listed
in my output, even if I redirect stderr to /dev/null. So obviously it
goes to stdout.
On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 11:03 -0700, Lawrence Ibarria wrote:
-Original Message-
From: bug-make-bounces+libarria=nvidia@gnu.org [mailto:bug-make-
bounces+libarria=nvidia@gnu.org] On Behalf Of David Boyce
Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2011 2:17 PM
To: Tim Murphy
Cc:
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 23:59 +0200, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
On 10/03/2011 06:22 PM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
To re-summarize:
- make does not color its output itself as of now
- colorized output would help distincing output by make
from output by programs involked by make,
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 00:05 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 22:11:23 +0200
From: Sebastian Pipping sebast...@pipping.org
* The implementation is clean and portable and doesn't add lots of
complexity to the code. Does everything support the color codes
On Sat, 2011-10-08 at 17:34 +0200, Georg Sauthoff wrote:
Hi,
currently the online manual section on eval
http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/make.html#Eval-Function
contains an example with folowing line:
define PROGRAM_template =
In comparison to that my local info page (make
On Sat, 2011-10-08 at 18:04 +0200, Georg Sauthoff wrote:
It's not the manual that's outdated, it's your version of GNU make.
oh, you are right.
Somehow did not expect such a change in syntax at this age of GNU make or
between minor version numbers.
There is always new syntax in every
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 19:18 +, Troy Runkel wrote:
FYI,
I believe I've located the fix in the GNU make CVS repository that
resolves the excessive stat() call problem. I've back-ported the fix
into 3.82 and it appears to be working in our build system. The patch
for 'read.c' is attached
On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 21:06 +, Troy Runkel wrote:
During our investigation we found that make 3.82 performs more stat()
calls than 3.81.
Hi Troy. I've verified that this issue exists in 3.82 but it's already
been fixed in CVS and the fix will be available in the next release of
GNU make.
On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 15:54 -0500, Dennis Sonifer wrote:
I have an HPUX 11.23 PA-RISC machine. Downloaded the make file from
your site, make-3.82.tar.gz. I am hoping there is just a setting or
two away from perfection but I am generally unfamiliar with installing
packages.
Looks like there
On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 16:31 -0500, Brandon Casey wrote:
all::
SHELL_PATH = /bin/sh
SHELL = $(SHELL_PATH)
some_file: shell_compatibility_test FORCE
@echo making some_file
@$(SHELL) true
Are you sure you don't mean $(SHELL) -c true here? The above will
never succeed unless
On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 01:58 +, Michael Witten wrote:
Hello?
I do prefer bugs files in Savannah to things sent on the mailing list,
just because they're easier to keep track of.
I applied this patch.
--
---
Paul
On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 17:02 -0300, Marcos Hocpfner wrote:
hello, I need know, whit that version the GCC compiler the same, I am
intall on a Solaris 10 sparc
This list is for people who need help using the GNU make program. You
need to ask your question on a list dedicated to either the GCC
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 15:22 +0530, Rahul wrote:
I am using make (version 3.81) for compilation.
However the automatic variable $ doesnt increment as expected and uses
the 1st source file itself for compiling all the objects.
There's not much help we can give based on this description. Please
There is no standard definition of lexical order that I'm aware of
that means only, and exactly, sorted according to the current locale
collation definition. The free dictionary defines it as:
the arrangement of a set of items in accordance with a recursive
algorithm, such as the
Please don't reply only to me: discussions belong on the mailing lists.
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 15:32 -0400, Rob Holbert wrote:
The key in that definition is depends on their first letter, not
the capitalization of their first letter. But in any event, if you
don't have a clear definition for
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 22:01 -0500, Perry Smith wrote:
I opened a bug report with PostgreSQL but I believe it is a problem with
make.
The bug report there is 6059:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2011-06/msg00109.php
You can also read a post here:
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 14:13 +0100, Duncan Moore wrote:
Using this makefile:
.PHONY: all
all: lib.a( a.o)
(%.o): %.o
@echo $@ $
make 3.81 gives what I would expect:
lib.a a.o
make 3.82, with the corrections for bug #30612, gives:
make: *** No rule to make target `lib.a()', needed
On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 16:35 -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
This is with GNU Make 3.81. I originally posted this as a question on
Stack Overflow, http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6233574/
According to the docs (10.5.1), % in a pattern rule matches any
nonempty substring. But it seems to
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 15:02 +0200, Mario Schwalbe wrote:
$ LC_ALL=C make -f Makefile.private-bug
prereq:
make: *** No rule to make target `private', needed by `target'. Stop.
$ LC_ALL=C make -v
GNU Make 3.81
The private feature was added in GNU make 3.82. It's not available in
GNU make
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 09:23 +0200, Folkert van Heusden wrote:
When there's something going wrong in the makefile causing a make
multiple target patterns, make doesn't tell you what these multiple
targets are.
That is inconvenient when working with e.g. scriptfiles that select targets.
Also -d
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 10:10 +0200, Julien Palard wrote:
I have hard time to understand a part of the make manual, the problem
can be a typo of a subject not clearly expressed, here is the point :
In the page about multiline variables :
On Sat, 2011-05-07 at 17:06 +0400, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
This change seems to be breaking how $(wildcard) works for patterns
without glob characters.
Ouch, you're right. Something missed in the regression test suite!
I'll fix it.
--
On Sat, 2011-05-07 at 10:15 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
On Sat, 2011-05-07 at 17:06 +0400, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
This change seems to be breaking how $(wildcard) works for patterns
without glob characters.
Ouch, you're right. Something missed in the regression test suite!
I'll fix
On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 09:48 +0200, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
The other thing I was thinking is that this feature might want to be
enabled via a command-line argument. All the complex makefiles
generated by automake, etc. for example cannot take advantage of this
if you have to modify every
On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 17:39 +0200, Akim Demaille wrote:
Le 2 mai 2011 à 16:07, Paul Smith a écrit :
Hi Paul!
So, the circular dependency issue is because of this:
%.eps: %.pdf
%.eps %.pdf: %.dat
In the second rule you say that BOTH %.eps and %.pdf can be built from
%.dat
On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 15:03 +0200, Edward Welbourne wrote:
It all depends on the order in which make searches the rules, which is
why changing things in the makefile matters. If make finds the second
rule first then it sees it can build foo.eps and foo.pdf from foo.dat
and it's all good.
On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 13:00 -0400, David Boyce wrote:
The other thing I was thinking is that this feature might want to be
enabled via a command-line argument. All the complex makefiles
generated by automake, etc. for example cannot take advantage of this if
you have to modify every
On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 09:17 +0200, Akim Demaille wrote:
Using the attached Makefile (I spent quite a while to strip it down from an
Automake generated file), Make 3.81 reports:
$ make
echo accel.dat accel.dat
echo {accel.dat}
{accel.dat}
test -n accel.dat
echo accel.pdf accel.eps
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 16:57 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 12:43:53 +0100
From: Tim Murphy tnmur...@gmail.com
I think it's an inevitable consequence that if you have a long-running
task then the output from it won't appear until it has completely
finished and you
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 13:31 +0100, Jon Grant wrote:
I noticed that the all: target must be at the top of a makefile,
unless explicitly built by make all. Is this expected? It seems
quite limiting..
There is nothing special about the all target. That's just a
convention that many, but not all,
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 13:58 -0300, Federico Sanchez Pinzon wrote:
from GNU Make manual: 3.6 (Overriding Part of Another Makefile):
However, it is illegal for two makefiles to give different recipes for
the same target.
Thanks.
--
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 12:35 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
Anyhow - one problem we are seeing is that as we load and parse the
~50Mb of dependencies that we need (for part of writer) we are statting
the same files involved in dependencies sometimes a thousand times or
so. We do around 700k stats
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 07:18 +0100, Tim Murphy wrote:
Right, of course :-) That is the obvious reason for using files,
thanks! I was biased against writing things to disc which is probably
silly, because it's probably not slow when compared to the size of the
job that's running.
I think you
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 19:54 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
What about the other issue: with the fact that output from a recipe is
only shown when the entire recipe is done. I think this is a serious
drawback, at least in some use cases. Can anything be done about
that?
I don't see how. The
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 11:01 -0400, David Boyce wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 1:46 PM, David Boyce david.s.bo...@gmail.com wrote:
So I've made a proof-of-concept patch
against 3.82.90 which seems to work without that overhead and my
question is, would this be of interest towards 3.83?
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 20:48 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
From: Paul Smith psm...@gnu.org
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 13:29:09 -0400
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 11:01 -0400, David Boyce wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 1:46 PM, David Boyce david.s.bo...@gmail.com
wrote:
So I've made a proof
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 20:59 +0100, Tim Murphy wrote:
To prevent any kind of deadlock you sort of want to empty everything
the stderr and stdout pipe buffers may contain.
It is conceivable that the stdout pipe might contain two lines of text
and stderr pipe might contain 1 by the time your
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 08:57 +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
PS == Paul Smith p...@mad-scientist.net writes:
PS If you want a bug report to be filed and acknowledged, then you want:
PS https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=additemgroup=make
Thanks for answering! Well that's not the advertised
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 07:28 +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
I noticed that when submitting bugs to bug-*@gnu.org, unlike other bug
submission by mail systems, e.g., Deb bugs of Debian, the user receives
no cheery auto reply acknowledging the bug was ever even received and
didn't go into a
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 18:49 -0500, Michael Witten wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 00:00, Paul Smith psm...@gnu.org wrote:
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 03:52 -0500, Michael Witten wrote:
Thus, it makes most sense for `--dry-run' (`-n') to mask `--touch' (`-t')
rather than the other way around
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 12:35 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
These ~all come from calling 'glob'; I append a patch that tries to
call glob only if needed - it could be done more prettily:
That's interesting. I wonder why the glob expansion is so inefficient;
I would expect it to do the same kinds
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 03:52 -0500, Michael Witten wrote:
Thus, it makes most sense for `--dry-run' (`-n') to mask `--touch' (`-t')
rather than the other way around (which is the current, buggy, unexpected,
possibly ruinous behavior).
This patch seems correct to me.
--
On Sat, 2011-03-19 at 20:47 +0300, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
100020004000500060007000
3.82.90 (with patch,2.2s4.8s14.0s 23.5s 31.6s 44.4s
-O3, no asserts)
3.81 -O32.5s5.2s11.5s 14.1s 18.3s 23.8s
I
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 14:58 +0900, JamesHur(허성삼) wrote:
This is James Hur from Korea, I’ve been tried to solve specific
problem as follow and I got the answer through the googling.
- Problem : When I run make with Makefile, I got error message
as : Makefile:1458:mixed implicit and
On Sun, 2011-01-23 at 09:59 +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Paul Smith wrote on Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:27:01PM CET:
Thanks for your investigations here; that's very helpful. I had also
had some thoughts about improving the strcache in various ways. For
example, I was thinking maybe about
On Sat, 2011-02-19 at 22:30 +0800, ygsoft_plus wrote:
When I compile a source code with it, there is often this error :
Makefile:431: *** mixed implicit and normal rules. Stop.
It means the following two lines of the code have error :
config %config: scripts_basic outputmakefile
Thank you for these two patches; I've applied them in my workspace.
--
---
Paul D. Smith psm...@gnu.org Find some GNU make tips at:
http://www.gnu.org http://make.mad-scientist.net
Please
On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 21:05 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Okay. Any hints for where to put breakpoints to see when the Make
reads the directory for the offending file (the one that gets deleted
by the rule)? I'd like to compare the behavior on GNU/Linux and on
Windows, so that I could decide
On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 11:35 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
But I wonder if this is really Windows-specific. Could this be the
example you asked for in Savannah bug#443 and #14617 (which was hoped
to be solved in bug#21231)? Can you tell me what causes Make to renew
the cache used by $(wildcard)
On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 20:46 -0500, Hsu, Shihchieh IAS wrote:
Summary: Using $(eval) to get information at the time a target is
invoked, but instead information gotten is when “make” is invoked.
Problem occurs for make3.81 and make 3.82 on Windows XP
It works fine for me on Linux, after I
On Mon, 2010-12-27 at 16:19 +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
On (info (make) Automatic Variables) you mention
`$(@F)' is equivalent to `$(notdir $@)'.
But on (info (make) File Name Functions) you don't mention the
converse!
Nobody would have guessed there are shorter ways to write those
Hi Sergio; it would help us greatly if you'd choose an email client that
would preserve whitespace in your mail when you send it; stripping
leading whitespace from your messages makes it very difficult to
correctly parse your examples. Thanks!
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 10:22 +0100, Sergio Villone
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 08:41 +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
By the way, make(1) lacks any of this time comparison resolution
machinery at all! I'll CC them.
Can you be more clear? What is the behavior you are missing today, that
you would like to have?
I'm not following how this feature of
Hm; I thought they restored Savannah as of 11/24 after the break-in, but
this bug (filed 11/23) no longer exists in the database so I guess they
must have restored an earlier copy than that.
Anyway this is fixed; if you want to re-submit it to Savannah that's
fine: I'll mark it fixed. Otherwise
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 21:10 +, Paul D. Smith wrote:
Update of bug #31743 (project make):
Triage Status:None = Verified
___
Follow-up Comment #1:
Actually it doesn't work (always)
On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 13:14 +0100, Sergio Villone wrote:
you ill find in the allegate a directory containg a possible guilty
makefile (prova), a text file f the result of running this makefile
and a text file (comment) explaining the misleading results
Hi Sergio; in the future we prefer if
On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 18:14 +0100, Christophe Jarry wrote:
I found an error in GNU make 3.82, inside `fr.po' file.
Line 514 of `fr.po' reads:
msgstr Évitement de récursion dans une régle implicite.\n
It should be replaced with:
msgstr Évitement de récursion dans une règle
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 12:46 -0800, Warren Dodge wrote:
* WARNING: Future backward-incompatibility!
Wildcards are not documented as returning sorted values, but up to and
including this release the results have been sorted and some makefiles are
apparently depending on that. In the next
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 16:15 +0100, Edward Welbourne wrote:
$ echo 'a b:; echo $@' | make -f - a b
echo a b
a b
and what happens if you
echo 'a b:; echo $@' | make -f - a
? If that doesn't echo a, then you've broken all rules with more than
one target ...
I expected your escaping
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 15:47 +0100, Rafaël Carré wrote:
Hello,
I believe I've found a bug in make 3.81, or at least some confusing
behaviour.
Here is a comparison of GNU make and netbsd 'pmake'
A-$(X) isn't expanded to A-1 because of the comment on the line where
X is set, although X is
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 16:08 -0600, Duke Normandin wrote:
%.o:%.mod
$(MODULA) %
This should be $, not %.
___
Bug-make mailing list
Bug-make@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 06:14 -0700, Jasleen Sidhu wrote:
i m trying to use srilm.during moses installation .i have made the
changes in make file that is set srilm .
but when i write 'make world' it shows following mesaage
make:sbin/machine-type command not found.
make.**no file to make **
The
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 10:23 -0700, David Highley wrote:
Good news, it appears that Red Hat 5.4 with GNU make 3.81-3 fixes the
issue we are running into. Now to find the right version for Cygwin.
I'd be really interested to know whether the current latest release of
GNU make (3.82) has this
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 11:07 -0700, David Highley wrote:
The latest version of Fedora 13 does not have a 3.82 verion of make so
the only way to test would be to build from source which I can do. It
may take me a while since were pretty busy right now.
Building make from source is pretty
Please send all questions to the mailing list, rather than emailing me
personally. Thanks!
On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 12:43 +0400, Alexander Kornilov wrote:
1) Are the special target which executed before all other target? It's
maybe used for some initializations and preparing of build process
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 13:54 +0400, Alexander Kornilov wrote:
BUG #0001:
---
Description: The rule for generation dependency file (%.d) doesn't work
on Linux platform;
Severity: Major;
Steps to reproduce:
1. Unpack bug_0001.zip files from letter attachment;
2. Execute makefile
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 18:42 +0400, Alexander Kornilov wrote:
Could you, please, review my new example (bug_0001_fixed.zip
attached)?
But some issue still present on Windows platform:
Preconditions: 'Obj' directory present as dependency of target (see
example from attachment).
Obj/%.d:
On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 11:01 +0430, ali hagigat wrote:
I copied some lines of the 2010 make manual, page 19. It says
prerequisite list will be:
/tmp/var/bar/foo.c
Where is 'var'?
You're right; that should not contain a var. I've fixed that in the
source.
--
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 17:45 +0200, Kamil Mierzejewski wrote:
I came up with a solution to this long-lasting, largely-talked problem
of recursive make invocation.
Can you please clearly describe the problems you want to solve, then
describe the solutions you came up with?
The above problem
On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 11:12 +0430, ali hagigat wrote:
Please check the following section of the make manual:
I'm not quite sure what you're trying to say. You have a version of the
manual published in 2006. It has a problem. There have since been new
versions of the manual made available,
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 14:15 +0530, Tejbahadur Singh // Viva wrote:
/bin/sh: line 1: glib-mkenums: command not found
make[2]: *** [s-enum-types-h] Error 127
This mailing list is for problems with the GNU make program itself. We
can't possibly help troubleshoot all the hundreds of thousands of
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 19:52 +0200, Matthias Hopf wrote:
All except those in targets/SECONDARY (which I do not 100% understand
yet) are related to tests using sleep for parallelization tests -
something highly unreliable on systems with lots of processors and
high load.
Lots of processors
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 16:10 +0200, Matthias Hopf wrote:
In effect, the tests of make 3.81 failed on our build systems every now
and then. For 3.82 this is worse, I was able to sometimes fail one of
the tests even on my local workstation with 8 cores and not too much
stuff running otherwise. It
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 20:15 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
From: Paul Smith psm...@gnu.org
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:40:55 -0400
Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
Right, I didn't mean flock() or something; I just meant test for
existence. But, doing a loop waiting for a file to exist in a UNIX
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 20:32 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
From: Paul Smith psm...@gnu.org
CC: mh...@suse.de, bug-make@gnu.org
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:24:45 -0400
Too bad GNU's version of sleep, that accepts fractional seconds, is not
portable :-).
How about introducing a new Make
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 21:15 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
From: Paul Smith psm...@gnu.org
CC: mh...@suse.de, bug-make@gnu.org
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:41:44 -0400
How about introducing a new Make function $(sleep) ? ;-)
I don't see how that can work...? We don't want make to sleep
On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 15:05 +, e...@opera.com wrote:
Quoting Edward Peschko e...@yahoo-inc.com:
My question - how do you actually trace this back to the target that
generated this statement? In this case, the ghostscript Makefile is
so convoluted that it goes through levels of
On Sun, 2010-08-29 at 14:13 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 15:05 +, e...@opera.com wrote:
Quoting Edward Peschko e...@yahoo-inc.com:
My question - how do you actually trace this back to the target that
generated this statement? In this case, the ghostscript Makefile
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 10:24 +0200, Stanisław Findeisen wrote:
Is there any way to know a path (absolute, or relative to the primary
Makefile) of an included Makefile? In that included Makefile of
course.
Look up the documentation for the MAKEFILE_LIST variable in the GNU make
manual.
--
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 02:26 +0200, Alexis ROBERT wrote:
Something more like ... this ? :)
Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
0xb7fe1424 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
(gdb) backtrace
#6 0xb7ef21cd in free () from /lib/libc.so.6
#7 0x080522a6 in func_sort (
o=0xc6d9eb4
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 20:03 +0200, Alexis ROBERT wrote:
I'm trying to build Android with ArchLinux for my Nexus One and I'm
having the following message during the build :
find: `drm/java': No such file or directory
find: `drm/java': No such file or directory
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 07:17 -0500, Peter Fales wrote:
A user has complained about Makefiles that broke when we updated from
make-8.31 to make-3.82, demonstrated by this sample Makefile:
Help %::
@$(ShowTargets)
As I understand it, this is intended to catch the unspecifed target and
On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 11:54 -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote:
I guess I was thinking that variables are exported between makes the
same way that environments variables are passed between processes.
Well, certainly variables CAN be exported by make (see the export
command) and passed to sub-makes
On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 12:41 -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Alas much of this is beyond my control, and it's not a single project:
it's a Linux distro having a couple of hundred projects, many of which
have several directories deep of makefile nesting.
Ah, well, you didn't say so :-).
One
On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 14:00 -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote:
The offender I'm staring at right now is ppp-2.4.5.
I'll try to autoconfiscate it (autoconf + obsfucate?) later.
I wasn't suggesting you should autoconfiscate it. I was suggesting the
maintainers of the package should. PPP is a
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 11:51 +0300, Thomas Backlund wrote:
BOOT_TARGETS = zImage zImage.initrd uImage zImage% dtbImage%
treeImage.% cuImage.% simpleImage.%
Now, I dont know if this is intended breakage by the make update, or
if the Makefile needs to be updated
The change is intentional.
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 22:44 -0700, Howard Chu wrote:
The scheme that I grew up with on Alliant Concentrix was just to prefix each
output line with its job number |xx|blah blah blah. It obviously requires a
pipe for each child process' output, so that lines can be read by the parent
make and
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 13:31 -0400, Ana Zoghbi wrote:
I would like to kindly ask your help with an error I’m getting when
running the gmake command. I would appreciate anything that you could
do to help me.
I’m trying to install the sudosh2 SW that I downloaded from this site
gcc
1101 - 1200 of 1343 matches
Mail list logo
