On Tue, 31 May 2011 20:57:10 +0900, Edward Welbourne e...@opera.com
wrote:
I haven't looked at the code, but one warning: it's important to not
assume that blah/../foo/ is equivalent to foo/ - blah might be a
symlink.
While this is true, I am not sure one which side this should be solved.
On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 13:10:28 +0200
Edward Welbourne e...@opera.com wrote:
You might read: http://make.mad-scientist.net/autodep.html
Thanks for the link. I have read that a while ago actually, but it was
nice finding it again. The point remains: There are better was than
what's in the info
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #30340 (project make):
I posted this bug, but forgot to login before posting.
___
Reply to this item at:
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?30340
___
Message sent
, unless of course, you prefer to do that
yourself.
Best regards,
Florian Rivoal
___
Bug-make mailing list
Bug-make@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
