Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 22:49:31 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor m...@cgf.cx
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 08:02:54PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 11:52:58 -0500
From: Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com
Cc: Pavel Fedin p.fe...@samsung.com, bug-make@gnu.org
fork() is
On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 11:16:44AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 22:49:31 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor m...@cgf.cx
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 08:02:54PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 11:52:58 -0500
From: Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com
Cc:
Hello!
Please take this patch, Cygwin team told that they would like to integrate
with upstream. I have already posted it some time ago but got no reply.
The patch significantly improves performance of Make under Cygwin.
Kind regards,
Pavel Fedin
Expert Engineer
Samsung Electronics Research
From: Pavel Fedin p.fe...@samsung.com
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 14:42:23 +0400
Please take this patch, Cygwin team told that they would like to integrate
with upstream. I have already posted it some time ago but got no reply.
The patch significantly improves performance of Make under Cygwin.
Hi...
bug-make-bounces+roland.schwingel=onevision@gnu.org wrote on
30.07.2013 17:39:10:
From: Pavel Fedin p.fe...@samsung.com
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 14:42:23 +0400
Please take this patch, Cygwin team told that they would like to
integrate
with upstream. I have already posted it
On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 18:39 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
In general, I feel it's wrong to do this: Cygwin is a Posix platform,
so it should be using the Posix code, to be as compatible with other
Posix platforms as possible. EMX is not a Posix platform, so using
its code will likely make the
Hi Eli...
Eli Zaretskii e...@gnu.org wrote on 30.07.2013 18:29:53:
From: Eli Zaretskii e...@gnu.org
To: Roland Schwingel roland.schwin...@onevision.com
Cc: bug-make@gnu.org, p.fe...@samsung.com
Date: 30.07.2013 18:32
Subject: Re: [PATCH1/2] Use spawn() on Cygwin
Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Eli Zaretskii e...@gnu.org wrote:
From: Pavel Fedin p.fe...@samsung.com
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 14:42:23 +0400
Please take this patch, Cygwin team told that they would like to integrate
with upstream. I have already posted it some time ago but got no reply.
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 11:52:58 -0500
From: Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com
Cc: Pavel Fedin p.fe...@samsung.com, bug-make@gnu.org
fork() is a very expensive operation in cygwin.
Yes, I know. But without it, some things that are expected of a Posix
behavior will not work. A notable
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 01:24:45 +0400
From: Pavel Fedin pavel_fe...@mail.ru
Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
There was a short discussion in Cygwin ML with test results, sorry, i
cannot find the URL, Google fails to find it.
Can you at least tell when (year and month) this discussion took
place?
In
10 matches
Mail list logo