Re: [bug #26596] MAKEFLAGS documentation tweak

2013-05-23 Thread Paul Smith
On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 22:09 +0200, Stefano Lattarini wrote: On 05/22/2013 06:56 PM, Paul Smith wrote: I've reworked the MFLAGS / MAKEFLAGS generation to be more regular and rigorous yesterday, for 4.0, and to preserve _some_ backward-compat; I had thought about this issue when I did so.

[bug #26596] MAKEFLAGS documentation tweak

2013-05-22 Thread Paul D. Smith
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #26596 (project make): Hm. I'm not sure why the immediate expansion has limited content. Is there any purpose to this? Wouldn't it just be better to have the immediate expansion resolve to the entire thing? I'll have to look into it; maybe there's a good reason for

Re: [bug #26596] MAKEFLAGS documentation tweak

2013-05-22 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Hi Paul. On 05/22/2013 05:17 PM, Paul D. Smith wrote: Follow-up Comment #1, bug #26596 (project make): Hm. I'm not sure why the immediate expansion has limited content. Is there any purpose to this? Wouldn't it just be better to have the immediate expansion resolve to the entire thing?

[bug #26596] MAKEFLAGS documentation tweak

2009-05-16 Thread anonymous
URL: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?26596 Summary: MAKEFLAGS documentation tweak Project: make Submitted by: None Submitted on: Sun 17 May 2009 12:01:32 AM UTC Severity: 3 - Normal Item Group: Enhancement