Hi Paul,
Paul D. Smith psm...@gnu.org writes:
I'm not sure I fully understood the situation.
This comment makes it sound like same version of make (same code) is 50%
slower on the new system. Is that what you meant?
Yes, the same make binary is 50% faster on 2-generations old Xeon
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 13:51 +0200, Boris Kolpackov wrote:
Paul D. Smith psm...@gnu.org writes:
I'm not sure I fully understood the situation.
This comment makes it sound like same version of make (same code) is 50%
slower on the new system. Is that what you meant?
Yes, the same make
From: Denis Excoffier bug-...@denis-excoffier.org
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 12:34:35 +0200
Cc: Eli Zaretskii e...@gnu.org,
pavel_fe...@mail.ru
On 2013-09-24 07:40, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Could be, as I don't think I've seen any EMX-related changes for a
long time.
On the contrary,
I'm not sure if Pavel is on this list so adding him explicitly.
Looks like there's a strong risk that no version of the spawn patch will
get into 4.0 which would be a shame IMHO.
-David
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Frank Heckenbach
f.heckenb...@fh-soft.dewrote:
Try this patch. I don't
On Mon, 2013-09-23 at 11:02 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
There's also another problem: you added a test script dash-w, where we
already had a dash-W. On Windows, these two map to the same file, so
git overwrites the same file, and the file is always marked as
modified. Please rename one of
