On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 19:06 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
I still don't want to add back the pointer to the struct. Memory usage
by GNU make is becoming a sore spot, especially as larger and larger
build systems start to move to non-recursive make. If necessary we'll
need to make the list
On Sat, 2013-05-18 at 14:20 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
From: Paul Smith psm...@gnu.org
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 04:12:15 -0400
Hi all. The first release candidate for the next release of GNU make,
GNU make 4.0, is now available for download:
Paul, can you please add 4.0 to the list
On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 19:42 +0200, Denis Excoffier wrote:
Compared with make-3.82, the new make-3.99.90 breaks those Makefiles,
like in tiff-v3.6.1 (rather old i know, before 2003 at least), that
use the construction:
make -${MAKEFLAGS}
Hrm. This is actually specifically discouraged by the
On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 22:35 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
When a dynamic extension is being remade, it is unloaded by calling
unload_file. The latter looks up its argument in a linked list of
loaded objects. Now, unload_file is called with file-name as its
argument; is it 100% sure that this
Hi Paul,
Paul D. Smith psm...@gnu.org writes:
There's still a serious regression in the code due to the change in
pattern rule searching added in 3.82. In some (not that unusual)
circumstance GNU make will chew _enormous_ amounts of memory, compared
to what it used to use in 3.81 and below.
On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 11:09 -0400, Boris Kolpackov wrote:
This is because in the current algorithm, every single time we do an
implicit rule search and compute possible target and dependency names
they are all added to the string cache, even if they are deemed to be
useless and not needed
On 2013-05-20 15:16, Paul Smith wrote:
On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 19:42 +0200, Denis Excoffier wrote:
Compared with make-3.82, the new make-3.99.90 breaks those Makefiles,
like in tiff-v3.6.1 (rather old i know, before 2003 at least), that
use the construction:
make -${MAKEFLAGS}
Hrm. This
From: Paul Smith psm...@gnu.org
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 04:12:15 -0400
Hi all. The first release candidate for the next release of GNU make,
GNU make 4.0, is now available for download:
Paul, can you please add 4.0 to the list of versions accepted by the
Savannah bug tracking UI, so that
Hi Paul,
I've built the RC and used it in a couple of common scenarios
on our build system. So far I haven't seen any regressions.
I've also tested the up-to-date check time compared to 3.81
and the new version is significantly faster (5.63s vs 8.15s).
That's very welcome.
I would like to use
Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 14:00:44 -0400
From: Boris Kolpackov bo...@kolpackov.net
Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
I've also tested the up-to-date check time compared to 3.81
and the new version is significantly faster (5.63s vs 8.15s).
Can you show a Makefile to test that? I'd like to measure this on
From: Paul Smith psm...@gnu.org
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 04:12:15 -0400
Hi all. The first release candidate for the next release of GNU make,
GNU make 4.0, is now available for download:
http://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/make/make-3.99.90.tar.gz
37c2d65196a233a8166d323f5173cdee
11 matches
Mail list logo
