Follow-up Comment #11, bug #61226 (project make):
In the abstract, it seems to me that if a user asks to include a file and that
file doesn't exist, that the include should generate some kind of error.
However, maybe you're right that if a rule exists that tells make how to build
that included
Follow-up Comment #10, bug #61226 (project make):
[comment #9 comment #9:]
> I will leave this issue open to think about how to best introduce a
backward-incompatible change that might help in this situation.
Do i understand it correctly, that as long as compatibility allows, you'd like
make to
Update of bug #61226 (project make):
Item Group: Bug => Enhancement
Summary: A regression prevents generation of missing included
dependency files. => Missing included files that have rules don't show as an
error
