On 02/04/18 02:00 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
On Mon, 2018-04-02 at 13:55 -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote:
Not sure what to do with that.
You may need this:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/make.git/commit/?id=193f1e81edd6b1b56b0eb0ff8aa4b41c7b4257b4
Or, latest from Git HEAD.
I started over from the
On Mon, 2018-04-02 at 13:55 -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> Not sure what to do with that.
You may need this:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/make.git/commit/?id=193f1e81edd6b1b56b0eb0ff8aa4b41c7b4257b4
Or, latest from Git HEAD.
___
Bug-make mailing
On 02/04/18 01:15 PM, Martin Dorey wrote:
checking whether closedir returns void... no
./configure: line 9678: PKG_PROG_PKG_CONFIG: command not found
./configure: line 9690: syntax error near unexpected token `GUILE,'
./configure: line 9690: ` PKG_CHECK_MODULES(GUILE, guile-2.0,
On Mon, 2018-04-02 at 10:02 -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> Well sure ... however before I get there I am still baffled why this
> current release code won't work on an old 32-bit intel debian server?
My understanding of the issue is that there's a compatibility problem
with the newly-released
I don't know why that would have only kicked off now but, in my limited
experience, autotools often works in ways that are similarly mysterious to me.
Yeah .. black magic under a full moon. :-\
Let's just do a git head pull here and give that a whirl.
Dennis
you went offlist .. let's not.
OK, I just was on a phone client that does not know my "real" email address,
used by the list, sorry.
no biggie .. it happens.
I meant to suggest to have a look at the output of ldd, to see
if there is anything weird there. E.g. I have (on the latest
> checking whether closedir returns void... no
> ./configure: line 9678: PKG_PROG_PKG_CONFIG: command not found
> ./configure: line 9690: syntax error near unexpected token `GUILE,'
> ./configure: line 9690: ` PKG_CHECK_MODULES(GUILE, guile-2.0,
> have_guile=yes,'
> debi686$
Perhaps it's:
On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 10:44:53AM -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> On 02/04/18 10:21 AM, Dmitrii Pasechnik wrote:
> > I just wonder whether this is a relatively common case of an updated
> > make dependence, which is incompatible on the binary level (e.g. due to
> > wrong minor version number).
> >
On 02/04/18 11:24 AM, Martin Dorey wrote:
> why this current release code won't work
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2016-06/msg5.html says
make-4.2.1 is from 2016-06-11. In the email thread I cited previously,
for what looked like the same errors, we see Paul writing, over
> why this current release code won't work
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2016-06/msg5.html says
make-4.2.1 is from 2016-06-11. In the email thread I cited previously, for
what looked like the same errors, we see Paul writing, over a year after that
release, on 2017-11-19, "I
On 02/04/18 10:21 AM, Dmitrii Pasechnik wrote:
Hi,
I just wonder whether this is a relatively common case of an updated
make dependence, which is incompatible on the binary level (e.g. due to
wrong minor version number).
E.g. if your make has guile extension enabled, it is easy to shoot
On 01/04/18 05:29 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
On Sun, 2018-04-01 at 16:56 -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote:
So I could just lift that out of glibc 2.27 and drop it into the make
source tree and have a go at it. Is that the idea here ?
You could try, but I'm not optimistic that it will just work.
On Sun, 2018-04-01 at 16:56 -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> So I could just lift that out of glibc 2.27 and drop it into the make
> source tree and have a go at it. Is that the idea here ?
You could try, but I'm not optimistic that it will just work.
I think the way forward is to get the latest
So I could just lift that out of glibc 2.27 and drop it into the make
source tree and have a go at it. Is that the idea here ?
phobos$ ls -lap glob
total 216
drwxr-sr-x 3 dclarke devl 4096 Apr 1 21:08 ./
drwxr-sr-x 9 dclarke devl 4096 Apr 1 21:02 ../
-rw-r--r-- 1 dclarke devl 1748
On 01/04/18 02:58 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
On Sun, 2018-04-01 at 14:54 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
The contents of the glob/ directory are actually taken directly from
glibc (although at this point an extremely old version) not developed
by GNU make.
Oh, or Martin's reply. I guess I'm getting
On Sun, 2018-04-01 at 14:54 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> The contents of the glob/ directory are actually taken directly from
> glibc (although at this point an extremely old version) not developed
> by GNU make.
Oh, or Martin's reply. I guess I'm getting really old since this rang
zero bells for
On Sun, 2018-04-01 at 13:18 -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> '/usr/local/build/make-4.2.1_linux_4.15.12-genunix_i686.003/glob'
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -g -O2 -MT glob.o -MD -MP -MF
> .deps/glob.Tpo -c -o glob.o glob.c
> glob.c: In function 'glob':
> glob.c:581:23: warning: implicit
17 matches
Mail list logo